Choosing an IT partner is not a matter of finding the longest service list. The real differences show up in local accountability, support coverage, security depth, review quality and how clearly a provider explains the working relationship. This directory brings those signals together so you can compare the field without opening twenty tabs.
How these Winnipeg IT providers were ranked
Each company was reviewed across its official website, local listing evidence, review platforms, exact company-directory profiles and known social accounts. Forty-seven factors roll into ten weighted categories and a 100-point score. Missing public evidence receives no points, but it is not treated as proof that a service or practice does not exist.
Ratings, review counts, addresses and hours can change. Any identity, location or brand-transition conflict that could affect a buyer is described in the relevant company card. First-party testimonials, mirrored reviews, verified platform reviews and platform-level summaries are not treated as interchangeable evidence.
- A. Identity & local presence: 10 points
- B. Review strength: 18 points
- C. Review trust & integrity: 10 points
- D. Online reputation risk: 10 points
- E. Service fit & expertise: 12 points
- F. Customer experience signals: 12 points
- G. Website & technical trust: 8 points
- H. Authority & third-party validation: 8 points
- I. Social, content & community proof: 6 points
- J. Pricing & commercial transparency: 6 points
MC
MSP Corp
1530 Taylor Ave #1, Winnipeg, MB R3N 1Y1
MSP Corp pairs a Winnipeg delivery team with a national bench across managed IT, cybersecurity, cloud, data and AI. It is the strongest overall choice for organizations that want one accountable partner, especially where uptime, governance and security all matter at once.
Mid-market, multi-site and regulated Canadian organizations that need managed or co-managed IT with deeper cybersecurity capability.
Security-first managed IT, local Winnipeg service and national specialist coverage under one operating model.
- Responsive support
- Long-term partnership
- Regulated-industry confidence
- National capability with local service
- Practical technical guidance
91.0 out of 100
Open any category, then expand an individual factor to see why it received its score and follow the supporting source.
A. Identity & local presence
The Taylor Avenue office, local phone, weekday hours and Winnipeg service pages align across the official site and local listing sources.
Show 5 scoring factors and reasoning
Google Business Profile completeness and control 5/5
Excellent evidence. The Taylor Avenue office, local phone, weekday hours and Winnipeg service pages align across the official site and local listing sources.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Google Business Profile completeness and control within identity & local presence.
Name, address and phone consistency 5/5
Excellent evidence. The Taylor Avenue office, local phone, weekday hours and Winnipeg service pages align across the official site and local listing sources.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Name, address and phone consistency within identity & local presence.
Local service-area clarity 5/5
Excellent evidence. The Taylor Avenue office, local phone, weekday hours and Winnipeg service pages align across the official site and local listing sources.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Local service-area clarity within identity & local presence.
Hours and availability 5/5
Excellent evidence. The Taylor Avenue office, local phone, weekday hours and Winnipeg service pages align across the official site and local listing sources.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Hours and availability within identity & local presence.
Local search discoverability 5/5
Excellent evidence. The Taylor Avenue office, local phone, weekday hours and Winnipeg service pages align across the official site and local listing sources.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Local search discoverability within identity & local presence.
B. Review strength
The accessible Winnipeg review footprint is tied to the prior Broadview identity at the same address and phone; named national testimonials add depth.
Show 6 scoring factors and reasoning
Rating strength 4/5
Strong evidence. The accessible Winnipeg review footprint is tied to the prior Broadview identity at the same address and phone; named national testimonials add depth.
- Weighted result
- 2.4 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Rating strength within review strength.
Review volume versus the market 2/5
Limited public evidence. The accessible Winnipeg review footprint is tied to the prior Broadview identity at the same address and phone; named national testimonials add depth.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review volume versus the market within review strength.
Review recency and cadence 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. The accessible Winnipeg review footprint is tied to the prior Broadview identity at the same address and phone; named national testimonials add depth.
- Weighted result
- 1.8 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review recency and cadence within review strength.
Review-platform diversity 4/5
Strong evidence. The accessible Winnipeg review footprint is tied to the prior Broadview identity at the same address and phone; named national testimonials add depth.
- Weighted result
- 2.4 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review-platform diversity within review strength.
Sentiment depth 5/5
Excellent evidence. The accessible Winnipeg review footprint is tied to the prior Broadview identity at the same address and phone; named national testimonials add depth.
- Weighted result
- 3.0 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Sentiment depth within review strength.
Critical-review rate and severity 5/5
Excellent evidence. The accessible Winnipeg review footprint is tied to the prior Broadview identity at the same address and phone; named national testimonials add depth.
- Weighted result
- 3.0 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Critical-review rate and severity within review strength.
C. Review trust & integrity
Identity continuity is well supported, although public owner-response evidence was not visible in the reviewed local profile.
Show 5 scoring factors and reasoning
Review authenticity risk 5/5
Excellent evidence. Identity continuity is well supported, although public owner-response evidence was not visible in the reviewed local profile.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review authenticity risk within review trust & integrity.
Owner response behaviour 0/5
Not found in the reviewed evidence. Identity continuity is well supported, although public owner-response evidence was not visible in the reviewed local profile.
- Weighted result
- 0.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Owner response behaviour within review trust & integrity.
Complaint-resolution evidence 4/5
Strong evidence. Identity continuity is well supported, although public owner-response evidence was not visible in the reviewed local profile.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Complaint-resolution evidence within review trust & integrity.
Review-collection compliance 4/5
Strong evidence. Identity continuity is well supported, although public owner-response evidence was not visible in the reviewed local profile.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review-collection compliance within review trust & integrity.
Duplicate and identity integrity 5/5
Excellent evidence. Identity continuity is well supported, although public owner-response evidence was not visible in the reviewed local profile.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Duplicate and identity integrity within review trust & integrity.
D. Online reputation risk
No material complaint, regulatory or adverse-media pattern was identified in the reviewed source set, and the operating platform shows strong continuity.
Show 5 scoring factors and reasoning
BBB and consumer-complaint risk 5/5
Excellent evidence. No material complaint, regulatory or adverse-media pattern was identified in the reviewed source set, and the operating platform shows strong continuity.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- BBB and consumer-complaint risk within online reputation risk.
Legal and regulatory risk 5/5
Excellent evidence. No material complaint, regulatory or adverse-media pattern was identified in the reviewed source set, and the operating platform shows strong continuity.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Legal and regulatory risk within online reputation risk.
Scam and adverse-media risk 5/5
Excellent evidence. No material complaint, regulatory or adverse-media pattern was identified in the reviewed source set, and the operating platform shows strong continuity.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Scam and adverse-media risk within online reputation risk.
Service-incident signals 5/5
Excellent evidence. No material complaint, regulatory or adverse-media pattern was identified in the reviewed source set, and the operating platform shows strong continuity.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Service-incident signals within online reputation risk.
Continuity and stability 5/5
Excellent evidence. No material complaint, regulatory or adverse-media pattern was identified in the reviewed source set, and the operating platform shows strong continuity.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Continuity and stability within online reputation risk.
E. Service fit & expertise
The official site documents managed and co-managed IT, MDR, Zero Trust, cloud, data, AI, Microsoft capabilities and multi-industry case evidence.
Show 6 scoring factors and reasoning
Service clarity 5/5
Excellent evidence. The official site documents managed and co-managed IT, MDR, Zero Trust, cloud, data, AI, Microsoft capabilities and multi-industry case evidence.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Service clarity within service fit & expertise.
Specialization 5/5
Excellent evidence. The official site documents managed and co-managed IT, MDR, Zero Trust, cloud, data, AI, Microsoft capabilities and multi-industry case evidence.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Specialization within service fit & expertise.
Credentials and certifications 5/5
Excellent evidence. The official site documents managed and co-managed IT, MDR, Zero Trust, cloud, data, AI, Microsoft capabilities and multi-industry case evidence.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Credentials and certifications within service fit & expertise.
Case studies and proof 5/5
Excellent evidence. The official site documents managed and co-managed IT, MDR, Zero Trust, cloud, data, AI, Microsoft capabilities and multi-industry case evidence.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Case studies and proof within service fit & expertise.
Staff expertise 5/5
Excellent evidence. The official site documents managed and co-managed IT, MDR, Zero Trust, cloud, data, AI, Microsoft capabilities and multi-industry case evidence.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Staff expertise within service fit & expertise.
Outcome evidence 5/5
Excellent evidence. The official site documents managed and co-managed IT, MDR, Zero Trust, cloud, data, AI, Microsoft capabilities and multi-industry case evidence.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Outcome evidence within service fit & expertise.
F. Customer experience signals
Direct local contact paths, 24/7 service, named client evidence and an assessment-led sales path create a complete buying experience.
Show 6 scoring factors and reasoning
Contact accessibility 5/5
Excellent evidence. Direct local contact paths, 24/7 service, named client evidence and an assessment-led sales path create a complete buying experience.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Contact accessibility within customer experience signals.
Response speed 5/5
Excellent evidence. Direct local contact paths, 24/7 service, named client evidence and an assessment-led sales path create a complete buying experience.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Response speed within customer experience signals.
Quote and intake quality 5/5
Excellent evidence. Direct local contact paths, 24/7 service, named client evidence and an assessment-led sales path create a complete buying experience.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Quote and intake quality within customer experience signals.
Pricing and value before contact 5/5
Excellent evidence. Direct local contact paths, 24/7 service, named client evidence and an assessment-led sales path create a complete buying experience.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Pricing and value before contact within customer experience signals.
Policies and guarantees 5/5
Excellent evidence. Direct local contact paths, 24/7 service, named client evidence and an assessment-led sales path create a complete buying experience.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Policies and guarantees within customer experience signals.
Communication and professionalism 5/5
Excellent evidence. Direct local contact paths, 24/7 service, named client evidence and an assessment-led sales path create a complete buying experience.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Communication and professionalism within customer experience signals.
G. Website & technical trust
The site is secure, current and rich in local, service and industry content, with only a modest structured-data gap in the public crawl.
Show 4 scoring factors and reasoning
HTTPS, mobile and site availability 5/5
Excellent evidence. The site is secure, current and rich in local, service and industry content, with only a modest structured-data gap in the public crawl.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- HTTPS, mobile and site availability within website & technical trust.
Content freshness 5/5
Excellent evidence. The site is secure, current and rich in local, service and industry content, with only a modest structured-data gap in the public crawl.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Content freshness within website & technical trust.
Structured data and search readiness 4/5
Strong evidence. The site is secure, current and rich in local, service and industry content, with only a modest structured-data gap in the public crawl.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Structured data and search readiness within website & technical trust.
Privacy, legal and accessibility 5/5
Excellent evidence. The site is secure, current and rich in local, service and industry content, with only a modest structured-data gap in the public crawl.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Privacy, legal and accessibility within website & technical trust.
H. Authority & third-party validation
Microsoft specialization, CRN recognition, partner relationships and third-party profiles give MSP Corp the strongest authority stack in the field.
Show 4 scoring factors and reasoning
Directory presence 5/5
Excellent evidence. Microsoft specialization, CRN recognition, partner relationships and third-party profiles give MSP Corp the strongest authority stack in the field.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Directory presence within authority & third-party validation.
Awards and recognition 5/5
Excellent evidence. Microsoft specialization, CRN recognition, partner relationships and third-party profiles give MSP Corp the strongest authority stack in the field.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Awards and recognition within authority & third-party validation.
Earned media and backlinks 5/5
Excellent evidence. Microsoft specialization, CRN recognition, partner relationships and third-party profiles give MSP Corp the strongest authority stack in the field.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Earned media and backlinks within authority & third-party validation.
Partner ecosystem 5/5
Excellent evidence. Microsoft specialization, CRN recognition, partner relationships and third-party profiles give MSP Corp the strongest authority stack in the field.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Partner ecosystem within authority & third-party validation.
I. Social, content & community proof
Active company channels and a large educational library support legitimacy, buyer education and national community visibility.
Show 3 scoring factors and reasoning
Social legitimacy and activity 4/5
Strong evidence. Active company channels and a large educational library support legitimacy, buyer education and national community visibility.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Social legitimacy and activity within social, content & community proof.
Educational content 5/5
Excellent evidence. Active company channels and a large educational library support legitimacy, buyer education and national community visibility.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Educational content within social, content & community proof.
Community involvement 4/5
Strong evidence. Active company channels and a large educational library support legitimacy, buyer education and national community visibility.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Community involvement within social, content & community proof.
J. Pricing & commercial transparency
Scope and value are well explained before contact; final pricing is appropriately tailored to environment size, risk and service coverage.
Show 3 scoring factors and reasoning
Contract, scope and terms clarity 5/5
Excellent evidence. Scope and value are well explained before contact; final pricing is appropriately tailored to environment size, risk and service coverage.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Contract, scope and terms clarity within pricing & commercial transparency.
Payment and deposit transparency 4/5
Strong evidence. Scope and value are well explained before contact; final pricing is appropriately tailored to environment size, risk and service coverage.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Payment and deposit transparency within pricing & commercial transparency.
Value competitiveness 4/5
Strong evidence. Scope and value are well explained before contact; final pricing is appropriately tailored to environment size, risk and service coverage.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Value competitiveness within pricing & commercial transparency.
Managed services are custom quoted. Clutch lists a $5,000+ typical project minimum and a $100 to $149 hourly benchmark for project work.
View pricing sourceAsk for a scoped monthly service plan, onboarding assumptions, SLA commitments, after-hours coverage and a clear division of responsibility for co-managed environments.
Verified digital footprint
Only profiles identified for this specific company are included.
Local profile
Review profiles
Directory profiles
CC
Constant C Technology Group
260-100 Innovation Drive, Winnipeg, MB R3T 6G2
Constant C is a long-established Winnipeg IT company with an unusually direct service promise. Its fixed-fee support, one-hour response guarantee and plain-language approach make it easy for a mid-sized business to understand what the relationship is meant to feel like.
Winnipeg mid-sized businesses that value predictable pricing, strong service guarantees and a relationship-led local team.
More than 40 years in business, explicit guarantees, 96.3% customer satisfaction and a 97% retention claim.
Most detailed customer stories are hosted on Constant C's own website, so buyers may want current third-party references during procurement.
- Fast action
- Reliable support
- Business understanding
- Clear communication
- Long client relationships
88.2 out of 100
Open any category, then expand an individual factor to see why it received its score and follow the supporting source.
A. Identity & local presence
The official site and Yellow Pages align on the Innovation Drive office, local phone, weekday hours and Winnipeg service area.
Show 5 scoring factors and reasoning
Google Business Profile completeness and control 5/5
Excellent evidence. The official site and Yellow Pages align on the Innovation Drive office, local phone, weekday hours and Winnipeg service area.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Google Business Profile completeness and control within identity & local presence.
Name, address and phone consistency 5/5
Excellent evidence. The official site and Yellow Pages align on the Innovation Drive office, local phone, weekday hours and Winnipeg service area.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Name, address and phone consistency within identity & local presence.
Local service-area clarity 5/5
Excellent evidence. The official site and Yellow Pages align on the Innovation Drive office, local phone, weekday hours and Winnipeg service area.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Local service-area clarity within identity & local presence.
Hours and availability 5/5
Excellent evidence. The official site and Yellow Pages align on the Innovation Drive office, local phone, weekday hours and Winnipeg service area.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Hours and availability within identity & local presence.
Local search discoverability 5/5
Excellent evidence. The official site and Yellow Pages align on the Innovation Drive office, local phone, weekday hours and Winnipeg service area.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Local search discoverability within identity & local presence.
B. Review strength
A strong local rating and named client testimonials show consistent satisfaction, with more depth on the official site than on independent platforms.
Show 6 scoring factors and reasoning
Rating strength 4/5
Strong evidence. A strong local rating and named client testimonials show consistent satisfaction, with more depth on the official site than on independent platforms.
- Weighted result
- 2.4 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Rating strength within review strength.
Review volume versus the market 4/5
Strong evidence. A strong local rating and named client testimonials show consistent satisfaction, with more depth on the official site than on independent platforms.
- Weighted result
- 2.4 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review volume versus the market within review strength.
Review recency and cadence 4/5
Strong evidence. A strong local rating and named client testimonials show consistent satisfaction, with more depth on the official site than on independent platforms.
- Weighted result
- 2.4 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review recency and cadence within review strength.
Review-platform diversity 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. A strong local rating and named client testimonials show consistent satisfaction, with more depth on the official site than on independent platforms.
- Weighted result
- 1.8 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review-platform diversity within review strength.
Sentiment depth 5/5
Excellent evidence. A strong local rating and named client testimonials show consistent satisfaction, with more depth on the official site than on independent platforms.
- Weighted result
- 3.0 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Sentiment depth within review strength.
Critical-review rate and severity 5/5
Excellent evidence. A strong local rating and named client testimonials show consistent satisfaction, with more depth on the official site than on independent platforms.
- Weighted result
- 3.0 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Critical-review rate and severity within review strength.
C. Review trust & integrity
Review identity is coherent and company responses are visible, although platform diversity is moderate.
Show 5 scoring factors and reasoning
Review authenticity risk 4/5
Strong evidence. Review identity is coherent and company responses are visible, although platform diversity is moderate.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review authenticity risk within review trust & integrity.
Owner response behaviour 4/5
Strong evidence. Review identity is coherent and company responses are visible, although platform diversity is moderate.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Owner response behaviour within review trust & integrity.
Complaint-resolution evidence 4/5
Strong evidence. Review identity is coherent and company responses are visible, although platform diversity is moderate.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Complaint-resolution evidence within review trust & integrity.
Review-collection compliance 4/5
Strong evidence. Review identity is coherent and company responses are visible, although platform diversity is moderate.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review-collection compliance within review trust & integrity.
Duplicate and identity integrity 5/5
Excellent evidence. Review identity is coherent and company responses are visible, although platform diversity is moderate.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Duplicate and identity integrity within review trust & integrity.
D. Online reputation risk
A 40-year operating history, high retention claim and no material public risk pattern support stability.
Show 5 scoring factors and reasoning
BBB and consumer-complaint risk 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 40-year operating history, high retention claim and no material public risk pattern support stability.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- BBB and consumer-complaint risk within online reputation risk.
Legal and regulatory risk 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 40-year operating history, high retention claim and no material public risk pattern support stability.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Legal and regulatory risk within online reputation risk.
Scam and adverse-media risk 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 40-year operating history, high retention claim and no material public risk pattern support stability.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Scam and adverse-media risk within online reputation risk.
Service-incident signals 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 40-year operating history, high retention claim and no material public risk pattern support stability.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Service-incident signals within online reputation risk.
Continuity and stability 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 40-year operating history, high retention claim and no material public risk pattern support stability.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Continuity and stability within online reputation risk.
E. Service fit & expertise
The service catalogue is clear and practical, with strongest depth in managed IT, backup, cloud, phones and network security.
Show 6 scoring factors and reasoning
Service clarity 5/5
Excellent evidence. The service catalogue is clear and practical, with strongest depth in managed IT, backup, cloud, phones and network security.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Service clarity within service fit & expertise.
Specialization 4/5
Strong evidence. The service catalogue is clear and practical, with strongest depth in managed IT, backup, cloud, phones and network security.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Specialization within service fit & expertise.
Credentials and certifications 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. The service catalogue is clear and practical, with strongest depth in managed IT, backup, cloud, phones and network security.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Credentials and certifications within service fit & expertise.
Case studies and proof 4/5
Strong evidence. The service catalogue is clear and practical, with strongest depth in managed IT, backup, cloud, phones and network security.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Case studies and proof within service fit & expertise.
Staff expertise 4/5
Strong evidence. The service catalogue is clear and practical, with strongest depth in managed IT, backup, cloud, phones and network security.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Staff expertise within service fit & expertise.
Outcome evidence 5/5
Excellent evidence. The service catalogue is clear and practical, with strongest depth in managed IT, backup, cloud, phones and network security.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Outcome evidence within service fit & expertise.
F. Customer experience signals
One-hour response, satisfaction and on-budget guarantees create the clearest service promise in the local market.
Show 6 scoring factors and reasoning
Contact accessibility 5/5
Excellent evidence. One-hour response, satisfaction and on-budget guarantees create the clearest service promise in the local market.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Contact accessibility within customer experience signals.
Response speed 5/5
Excellent evidence. One-hour response, satisfaction and on-budget guarantees create the clearest service promise in the local market.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Response speed within customer experience signals.
Quote and intake quality 5/5
Excellent evidence. One-hour response, satisfaction and on-budget guarantees create the clearest service promise in the local market.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Quote and intake quality within customer experience signals.
Pricing and value before contact 5/5
Excellent evidence. One-hour response, satisfaction and on-budget guarantees create the clearest service promise in the local market.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Pricing and value before contact within customer experience signals.
Policies and guarantees 5/5
Excellent evidence. One-hour response, satisfaction and on-budget guarantees create the clearest service promise in the local market.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Policies and guarantees within customer experience signals.
Communication and professionalism 5/5
Excellent evidence. One-hour response, satisfaction and on-budget guarantees create the clearest service promise in the local market.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Communication and professionalism within customer experience signals.
G. Website & technical trust
The website is secure and current, though its technical search and structured-data signals are less extensive than the largest providers.
Show 4 scoring factors and reasoning
HTTPS, mobile and site availability 5/5
Excellent evidence. The website is secure and current, though its technical search and structured-data signals are less extensive than the largest providers.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- HTTPS, mobile and site availability within website & technical trust.
Content freshness 4/5
Strong evidence. The website is secure and current, though its technical search and structured-data signals are less extensive than the largest providers.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Content freshness within website & technical trust.
Structured data and search readiness 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. The website is secure and current, though its technical search and structured-data signals are less extensive than the largest providers.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Structured data and search readiness within website & technical trust.
Privacy, legal and accessibility 5/5
Excellent evidence. The website is secure and current, though its technical search and structured-data signals are less extensive than the largest providers.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Privacy, legal and accessibility within website & technical trust.
H. Authority & third-party validation
Consumer Choice and MSP Titans recognition add useful validation beyond the local operating record.
Show 4 scoring factors and reasoning
Directory presence 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Consumer Choice and MSP Titans recognition add useful validation beyond the local operating record.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Directory presence within authority & third-party validation.
Awards and recognition 5/5
Excellent evidence. Consumer Choice and MSP Titans recognition add useful validation beyond the local operating record.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Awards and recognition within authority & third-party validation.
Earned media and backlinks 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Consumer Choice and MSP Titans recognition add useful validation beyond the local operating record.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Earned media and backlinks within authority & third-party validation.
Partner ecosystem 4/5
Strong evidence. Consumer Choice and MSP Titans recognition add useful validation beyond the local operating record.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Partner ecosystem within authority & third-party validation.
I. Social, content & community proof
Educational and community content is present, but the visible social footprint is smaller than several national competitors.
Show 3 scoring factors and reasoning
Social legitimacy and activity 2/5
Limited public evidence. Educational and community content is present, but the visible social footprint is smaller than several national competitors.
- Weighted result
- 0.8 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Social legitimacy and activity within social, content & community proof.
Educational content 4/5
Strong evidence. Educational and community content is present, but the visible social footprint is smaller than several national competitors.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Educational content within social, content & community proof.
Community involvement 4/5
Strong evidence. Educational and community content is present, but the visible social footprint is smaller than several national competitors.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Community involvement within social, content & community proof.
J. Pricing & commercial transparency
Fixed fees, guarantees and project terms are explained with exceptional clarity before a sales conversation.
Show 3 scoring factors and reasoning
Contract, scope and terms clarity 5/5
Excellent evidence. Fixed fees, guarantees and project terms are explained with exceptional clarity before a sales conversation.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Contract, scope and terms clarity within pricing & commercial transparency.
Payment and deposit transparency 5/5
Excellent evidence. Fixed fees, guarantees and project terms are explained with exceptional clarity before a sales conversation.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Payment and deposit transparency within pricing & commercial transparency.
Value competitiveness 5/5
Excellent evidence. Fixed fees, guarantees and project terms are explained with exceptional clarity before a sales conversation.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Value competitiveness within pricing & commercial transparency.
A fixed, predictable managed fee is the core offer. Projects may be fixed-price or time and materials, with an on-budget guarantee for defined work.
View pricing sourceConfirm the devices, users, onsite visits, project work and after-hours incidents included in the fixed fee.
Verified digital footprint
Only profiles identified for this specific company are included.
Directory profiles
Social accounts
3T
365 Technologies
Unit 1B-44 Tillage Way, Navin, MB R5T 0K5
365 Technologies is a Winnipeg-owned MSP built for small and mid-sized organizations that want a simple, flat-rate support model. Its clearest advantage is social proof: the company reports more than 225 Google reviews and publishes a steady stream of detailed client feedback.
Manitoba and Saskatchewan organizations with 10 or more users that want flat-rate, round-the-clock support.
The largest visible Google-review base in the comparison, paired with a focused 24/7 SMB offer.
The current Navin office differs from older Plinguet Street listings, so procurement teams should use the current official address.
- Prompt fixes
- Patient technicians
- Friendly help desk
- Attention to detail
- Reduced day-to-day IT stress
86.6 out of 100
Open any category, then expand an individual factor to see why it received its score and follow the supporting source.
A. Identity & local presence
The current official location and local service area are clear, but older review and directory citations still carry the former Plinguet Street address.
Show 5 scoring factors and reasoning
Google Business Profile completeness and control 4/5
Strong evidence. The current official location and local service area are clear, but older review and directory citations still carry the former Plinguet Street address.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Google Business Profile completeness and control within identity & local presence.
Name, address and phone consistency 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. The current official location and local service area are clear, but older review and directory citations still carry the former Plinguet Street address.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Name, address and phone consistency within identity & local presence.
Local service-area clarity 5/5
Excellent evidence. The current official location and local service area are clear, but older review and directory citations still carry the former Plinguet Street address.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Local service-area clarity within identity & local presence.
Hours and availability 5/5
Excellent evidence. The current official location and local service area are clear, but older review and directory citations still carry the former Plinguet Street address.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Hours and availability within identity & local presence.
Local search discoverability 5/5
Excellent evidence. The current official location and local service area are clear, but older review and directory citations still carry the former Plinguet Street address.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Local search discoverability within identity & local presence.
B. Review strength
The official site reports 225+ Google reviews and republishes detailed five-star feedback, creating the strongest visible review-volume signal in the field.
Show 6 scoring factors and reasoning
Rating strength 5/5
Excellent evidence. The official site reports 225+ Google reviews and republishes detailed five-star feedback, creating the strongest visible review-volume signal in the field.
- Weighted result
- 3.0 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Rating strength within review strength.
Review volume versus the market 5/5
Excellent evidence. The official site reports 225+ Google reviews and republishes detailed five-star feedback, creating the strongest visible review-volume signal in the field.
- Weighted result
- 3.0 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review volume versus the market within review strength.
Review recency and cadence 4/5
Strong evidence. The official site reports 225+ Google reviews and republishes detailed five-star feedback, creating the strongest visible review-volume signal in the field.
- Weighted result
- 2.4 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review recency and cadence within review strength.
Review-platform diversity 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. The official site reports 225+ Google reviews and republishes detailed five-star feedback, creating the strongest visible review-volume signal in the field.
- Weighted result
- 1.8 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review-platform diversity within review strength.
Sentiment depth 5/5
Excellent evidence. The official site reports 225+ Google reviews and republishes detailed five-star feedback, creating the strongest visible review-volume signal in the field.
- Weighted result
- 3.0 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Sentiment depth within review strength.
Critical-review rate and severity 5/5
Excellent evidence. The official site reports 225+ Google reviews and republishes detailed five-star feedback, creating the strongest visible review-volume signal in the field.
- Weighted result
- 3.0 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Critical-review rate and severity within review strength.
C. Review trust & integrity
Named reviewers, natural service detail and a coherent entity profile support trust, with moderate platform diversity.
Show 5 scoring factors and reasoning
Review authenticity risk 4/5
Strong evidence. Named reviewers, natural service detail and a coherent entity profile support trust, with moderate platform diversity.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review authenticity risk within review trust & integrity.
Owner response behaviour 4/5
Strong evidence. Named reviewers, natural service detail and a coherent entity profile support trust, with moderate platform diversity.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Owner response behaviour within review trust & integrity.
Complaint-resolution evidence 4/5
Strong evidence. Named reviewers, natural service detail and a coherent entity profile support trust, with moderate platform diversity.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Complaint-resolution evidence within review trust & integrity.
Review-collection compliance 4/5
Strong evidence. Named reviewers, natural service detail and a coherent entity profile support trust, with moderate platform diversity.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review-collection compliance within review trust & integrity.
Duplicate and identity integrity 5/5
Excellent evidence. Named reviewers, natural service detail and a coherent entity profile support trust, with moderate platform diversity.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Duplicate and identity integrity within review trust & integrity.
D. Online reputation risk
The company reports a 2010 founding and shows no material public complaint or incident pattern in the reviewed sources.
Show 5 scoring factors and reasoning
BBB and consumer-complaint risk 5/5
Excellent evidence. The company reports a 2010 founding and shows no material public complaint or incident pattern in the reviewed sources.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- BBB and consumer-complaint risk within online reputation risk.
Legal and regulatory risk 5/5
Excellent evidence. The company reports a 2010 founding and shows no material public complaint or incident pattern in the reviewed sources.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Legal and regulatory risk within online reputation risk.
Scam and adverse-media risk 5/5
Excellent evidence. The company reports a 2010 founding and shows no material public complaint or incident pattern in the reviewed sources.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Scam and adverse-media risk within online reputation risk.
Service-incident signals 5/5
Excellent evidence. The company reports a 2010 founding and shows no material public complaint or incident pattern in the reviewed sources.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Service-incident signals within online reputation risk.
Continuity and stability 5/5
Excellent evidence. The company reports a 2010 founding and shows no material public complaint or incident pattern in the reviewed sources.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Continuity and stability within online reputation risk.
E. Service fit & expertise
Services are packaged cleanly across Manage, Secure and Transform, with strong SMB, help desk, identity and Microsoft 365 depth.
Show 6 scoring factors and reasoning
Service clarity 5/5
Excellent evidence. Services are packaged cleanly across Manage, Secure and Transform, with strong SMB, help desk, identity and Microsoft 365 depth.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Service clarity within service fit & expertise.
Specialization 4/5
Strong evidence. Services are packaged cleanly across Manage, Secure and Transform, with strong SMB, help desk, identity and Microsoft 365 depth.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Specialization within service fit & expertise.
Credentials and certifications 4/5
Strong evidence. Services are packaged cleanly across Manage, Secure and Transform, with strong SMB, help desk, identity and Microsoft 365 depth.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Credentials and certifications within service fit & expertise.
Case studies and proof 4/5
Strong evidence. Services are packaged cleanly across Manage, Secure and Transform, with strong SMB, help desk, identity and Microsoft 365 depth.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Case studies and proof within service fit & expertise.
Staff expertise 4/5
Strong evidence. Services are packaged cleanly across Manage, Secure and Transform, with strong SMB, help desk, identity and Microsoft 365 depth.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Staff expertise within service fit & expertise.
Outcome evidence 4/5
Strong evidence. Services are packaged cleanly across Manage, Secure and Transform, with strong SMB, help desk, identity and Microsoft 365 depth.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Outcome evidence within service fit & expertise.
F. Customer experience signals
A 24/7 help desk, flat monthly model and detailed review feedback create a low-friction customer experience.
Show 6 scoring factors and reasoning
Contact accessibility 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 24/7 help desk, flat monthly model and detailed review feedback create a low-friction customer experience.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Contact accessibility within customer experience signals.
Response speed 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 24/7 help desk, flat monthly model and detailed review feedback create a low-friction customer experience.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Response speed within customer experience signals.
Quote and intake quality 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 24/7 help desk, flat monthly model and detailed review feedback create a low-friction customer experience.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Quote and intake quality within customer experience signals.
Pricing and value before contact 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 24/7 help desk, flat monthly model and detailed review feedback create a low-friction customer experience.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Pricing and value before contact within customer experience signals.
Policies and guarantees 4/5
Strong evidence. A 24/7 help desk, flat monthly model and detailed review feedback create a low-friction customer experience.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Policies and guarantees within customer experience signals.
Communication and professionalism 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 24/7 help desk, flat monthly model and detailed review feedback create a low-friction customer experience.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Communication and professionalism within customer experience signals.
G. Website & technical trust
The site is secure, current and well structured around buyer questions, services, locations and accessibility.
Show 4 scoring factors and reasoning
HTTPS, mobile and site availability 5/5
Excellent evidence. The site is secure, current and well structured around buyer questions, services, locations and accessibility.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- HTTPS, mobile and site availability within website & technical trust.
Content freshness 4/5
Strong evidence. The site is secure, current and well structured around buyer questions, services, locations and accessibility.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Content freshness within website & technical trust.
Structured data and search readiness 4/5
Strong evidence. The site is secure, current and well structured around buyer questions, services, locations and accessibility.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Structured data and search readiness within website & technical trust.
Privacy, legal and accessibility 5/5
Excellent evidence. The site is secure, current and well structured around buyer questions, services, locations and accessibility.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Privacy, legal and accessibility within website & technical trust.
H. Authority & third-party validation
Partner and directory evidence is credible, but earned media and awards are less prominent than at larger competitors.
Show 4 scoring factors and reasoning
Directory presence 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Partner and directory evidence is credible, but earned media and awards are less prominent than at larger competitors.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Directory presence within authority & third-party validation.
Awards and recognition 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Partner and directory evidence is credible, but earned media and awards are less prominent than at larger competitors.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Awards and recognition within authority & third-party validation.
Earned media and backlinks 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Partner and directory evidence is credible, but earned media and awards are less prominent than at larger competitors.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Earned media and backlinks within authority & third-party validation.
Partner ecosystem 4/5
Strong evidence. Partner and directory evidence is credible, but earned media and awards are less prominent than at larger competitors.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Partner ecosystem within authority & third-party validation.
I. Social, content & community proof
The company publishes educational content and maintains recognizable social accounts, with a primarily regional reach.
Show 3 scoring factors and reasoning
Social legitimacy and activity 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. The company publishes educational content and maintains recognizable social accounts, with a primarily regional reach.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Social legitimacy and activity within social, content & community proof.
Educational content 4/5
Strong evidence. The company publishes educational content and maintains recognizable social accounts, with a primarily regional reach.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Educational content within social, content & community proof.
Community involvement 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. The company publishes educational content and maintains recognizable social accounts, with a primarily regional reach.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Community involvement within social, content & community proof.
J. Pricing & commercial transparency
The flat-rate managed model is clear; exact pricing still depends on organization size, scope and the mix of managed versus standalone work.
Show 3 scoring factors and reasoning
Contract, scope and terms clarity 5/5
Excellent evidence. The flat-rate managed model is clear; exact pricing still depends on organization size, scope and the mix of managed versus standalone work.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Contract, scope and terms clarity within pricing & commercial transparency.
Payment and deposit transparency 4/5
Strong evidence. The flat-rate managed model is clear; exact pricing still depends on organization size, scope and the mix of managed versus standalone work.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Payment and deposit transparency within pricing & commercial transparency.
Value competitiveness 4/5
Strong evidence. The flat-rate managed model is clear; exact pricing still depends on organization size, scope and the mix of managed versus standalone work.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Value competitiveness within pricing & commercial transparency.
Fully managed support uses a tailored flat monthly rate with unlimited support. Co-managed and standalone services vary by scope.
View pricing sourceAsk what 365Care+ includes, how users and devices affect the monthly fee, and which project or onboarding costs sit outside it.
Verified digital footprint
Only profiles identified for this specific company are included.
Local profile
Review profiles
Directory profiles
RT
Resolute Technology Solutions
1858-201 Portage Avenue, Winnipeg, MB R3B 3K6
Resolute bridges day-to-day managed IT with consulting, applications, cloud, staffing and project delivery. That wider bench makes it a practical option when a company needs more than a help desk and expects its provider to support modernization work as well.
Mid-market and enterprise teams that need managed operations alongside consulting, staffing or application expertise.
A 50-plus-person multidisciplinary team, bilingual support, guaranteed SLAs and quantified delivery scale.
The official site lists Portage Avenue while a major listing mirror still shows 433 Main Street, suggesting a location update is still moving through local citations.
- Responsive service
- Organized project delivery
- Technical depth
- Business alignment
- Professional communication
84.4 out of 100
Open any category, then expand an individual factor to see why it received its score and follow the supporting source.
A. Identity & local presence
Winnipeg service coverage is explicit, but the official and listing addresses do not yet agree and public local hours come from a mirror.
Show 5 scoring factors and reasoning
Google Business Profile completeness and control 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Winnipeg service coverage is explicit, but the official and listing addresses do not yet agree and public local hours come from a mirror.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Google Business Profile completeness and control within identity & local presence.
Name, address and phone consistency 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Winnipeg service coverage is explicit, but the official and listing addresses do not yet agree and public local hours come from a mirror.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Name, address and phone consistency within identity & local presence.
Local service-area clarity 5/5
Excellent evidence. Winnipeg service coverage is explicit, but the official and listing addresses do not yet agree and public local hours come from a mirror.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Local service-area clarity within identity & local presence.
Hours and availability 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Winnipeg service coverage is explicit, but the official and listing addresses do not yet agree and public local hours come from a mirror.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Hours and availability within identity & local presence.
Local search discoverability 4/5
Strong evidence. Winnipeg service coverage is explicit, but the official and listing addresses do not yet agree and public local hours come from a mirror.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Local search discoverability within identity & local presence.
B. Review strength
A 4.9 rating and named client testimonials are positive, though independent review volume and platform breadth are moderate.
Show 6 scoring factors and reasoning
Rating strength 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 4.9 rating and named client testimonials are positive, though independent review volume and platform breadth are moderate.
- Weighted result
- 3.0 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Rating strength within review strength.
Review volume versus the market 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. A 4.9 rating and named client testimonials are positive, though independent review volume and platform breadth are moderate.
- Weighted result
- 1.8 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review volume versus the market within review strength.
Review recency and cadence 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. A 4.9 rating and named client testimonials are positive, though independent review volume and platform breadth are moderate.
- Weighted result
- 1.8 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review recency and cadence within review strength.
Review-platform diversity 2/5
Limited public evidence. A 4.9 rating and named client testimonials are positive, though independent review volume and platform breadth are moderate.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review-platform diversity within review strength.
Sentiment depth 4/5
Strong evidence. A 4.9 rating and named client testimonials are positive, though independent review volume and platform breadth are moderate.
- Weighted result
- 2.4 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Sentiment depth within review strength.
Critical-review rate and severity 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 4.9 rating and named client testimonials are positive, though independent review volume and platform breadth are moderate.
- Weighted result
- 3.0 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Critical-review rate and severity within review strength.
C. Review trust & integrity
The review profile appears coherent and low risk, with limited public visibility into owner responses.
Show 5 scoring factors and reasoning
Review authenticity risk 4/5
Strong evidence. The review profile appears coherent and low risk, with limited public visibility into owner responses.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review authenticity risk within review trust & integrity.
Owner response behaviour 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. The review profile appears coherent and low risk, with limited public visibility into owner responses.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Owner response behaviour within review trust & integrity.
Complaint-resolution evidence 4/5
Strong evidence. The review profile appears coherent and low risk, with limited public visibility into owner responses.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Complaint-resolution evidence within review trust & integrity.
Review-collection compliance 4/5
Strong evidence. The review profile appears coherent and low risk, with limited public visibility into owner responses.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review-collection compliance within review trust & integrity.
Duplicate and identity integrity 5/5
Excellent evidence. The review profile appears coherent and low risk, with limited public visibility into owner responses.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Duplicate and identity integrity within review trust & integrity.
D. Online reputation risk
The company shows strong continuity, ISO 27001 directory signals and no material adverse pattern in the reviewed evidence.
Show 5 scoring factors and reasoning
BBB and consumer-complaint risk 5/5
Excellent evidence. The company shows strong continuity, ISO 27001 directory signals and no material adverse pattern in the reviewed evidence.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- BBB and consumer-complaint risk within online reputation risk.
Legal and regulatory risk 5/5
Excellent evidence. The company shows strong continuity, ISO 27001 directory signals and no material adverse pattern in the reviewed evidence.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Legal and regulatory risk within online reputation risk.
Scam and adverse-media risk 5/5
Excellent evidence. The company shows strong continuity, ISO 27001 directory signals and no material adverse pattern in the reviewed evidence.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Scam and adverse-media risk within online reputation risk.
Service-incident signals 5/5
Excellent evidence. The company shows strong continuity, ISO 27001 directory signals and no material adverse pattern in the reviewed evidence.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Service-incident signals within online reputation risk.
Continuity and stability 5/5
Excellent evidence. The company shows strong continuity, ISO 27001 directory signals and no material adverse pattern in the reviewed evidence.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Continuity and stability within online reputation risk.
E. Service fit & expertise
Managed services sit beside deep consulting, staffing, applications, GRC and project capabilities, making service fit a clear strength.
Show 6 scoring factors and reasoning
Service clarity 5/5
Excellent evidence. Managed services sit beside deep consulting, staffing, applications, GRC and project capabilities, making service fit a clear strength.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Service clarity within service fit & expertise.
Specialization 5/5
Excellent evidence. Managed services sit beside deep consulting, staffing, applications, GRC and project capabilities, making service fit a clear strength.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Specialization within service fit & expertise.
Credentials and certifications 5/5
Excellent evidence. Managed services sit beside deep consulting, staffing, applications, GRC and project capabilities, making service fit a clear strength.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Credentials and certifications within service fit & expertise.
Case studies and proof 5/5
Excellent evidence. Managed services sit beside deep consulting, staffing, applications, GRC and project capabilities, making service fit a clear strength.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Case studies and proof within service fit & expertise.
Staff expertise 5/5
Excellent evidence. Managed services sit beside deep consulting, staffing, applications, GRC and project capabilities, making service fit a clear strength.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Staff expertise within service fit & expertise.
Outcome evidence 5/5
Excellent evidence. Managed services sit beside deep consulting, staffing, applications, GRC and project capabilities, making service fit a clear strength.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Outcome evidence within service fit & expertise.
F. Customer experience signals
Bilingual coverage, on-call support, guaranteed SLAs and clear contact paths support a strong client experience.
Show 6 scoring factors and reasoning
Contact accessibility 5/5
Excellent evidence. Bilingual coverage, on-call support, guaranteed SLAs and clear contact paths support a strong client experience.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Contact accessibility within customer experience signals.
Response speed 4/5
Strong evidence. Bilingual coverage, on-call support, guaranteed SLAs and clear contact paths support a strong client experience.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Response speed within customer experience signals.
Quote and intake quality 4/5
Strong evidence. Bilingual coverage, on-call support, guaranteed SLAs and clear contact paths support a strong client experience.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Quote and intake quality within customer experience signals.
Pricing and value before contact 4/5
Strong evidence. Bilingual coverage, on-call support, guaranteed SLAs and clear contact paths support a strong client experience.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Pricing and value before contact within customer experience signals.
Policies and guarantees 4/5
Strong evidence. Bilingual coverage, on-call support, guaranteed SLAs and clear contact paths support a strong client experience.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Policies and guarantees within customer experience signals.
Communication and professionalism 5/5
Excellent evidence. Bilingual coverage, on-call support, guaranteed SLAs and clear contact paths support a strong client experience.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Communication and professionalism within customer experience signals.
G. Website & technical trust
The official site is secure, current and extensive across services, industries, company information and resources.
Show 4 scoring factors and reasoning
HTTPS, mobile and site availability 5/5
Excellent evidence. The official site is secure, current and extensive across services, industries, company information and resources.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- HTTPS, mobile and site availability within website & technical trust.
Content freshness 5/5
Excellent evidence. The official site is secure, current and extensive across services, industries, company information and resources.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Content freshness within website & technical trust.
Structured data and search readiness 4/5
Strong evidence. The official site is secure, current and extensive across services, industries, company information and resources.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Structured data and search readiness within website & technical trust.
Privacy, legal and accessibility 5/5
Excellent evidence. The official site is secure, current and extensive across services, industries, company information and resources.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Privacy, legal and accessibility within website & technical trust.
H. Authority & third-party validation
Microsoft alignment, ISO signals, directories and partner evidence support a mature mid-market and enterprise profile.
Show 4 scoring factors and reasoning
Directory presence 4/5
Strong evidence. Microsoft alignment, ISO signals, directories and partner evidence support a mature mid-market and enterprise profile.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Directory presence within authority & third-party validation.
Awards and recognition 4/5
Strong evidence. Microsoft alignment, ISO signals, directories and partner evidence support a mature mid-market and enterprise profile.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Awards and recognition within authority & third-party validation.
Earned media and backlinks 4/5
Strong evidence. Microsoft alignment, ISO signals, directories and partner evidence support a mature mid-market and enterprise profile.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Earned media and backlinks within authority & third-party validation.
Partner ecosystem 5/5
Excellent evidence. Microsoft alignment, ISO signals, directories and partner evidence support a mature mid-market and enterprise profile.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Partner ecosystem within authority & third-party validation.
I. Social, content & community proof
Educational content is strong and the company is visible on professional channels, with moderate consumer-social reach.
Show 3 scoring factors and reasoning
Social legitimacy and activity 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Educational content is strong and the company is visible on professional channels, with moderate consumer-social reach.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Social legitimacy and activity within social, content & community proof.
Educational content 5/5
Excellent evidence. Educational content is strong and the company is visible on professional channels, with moderate consumer-social reach.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Educational content within social, content & community proof.
Community involvement 4/5
Strong evidence. Educational content is strong and the company is visible on professional channels, with moderate consumer-social reach.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Community involvement within social, content & community proof.
J. Pricing & commercial transparency
Service tiers and SLA concepts are explained, while final rates, deposits and detailed managed-service scope remain proposal based.
Show 3 scoring factors and reasoning
Contract, scope and terms clarity 4/5
Strong evidence. Service tiers and SLA concepts are explained, while final rates, deposits and detailed managed-service scope remain proposal based.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Contract, scope and terms clarity within pricing & commercial transparency.
Payment and deposit transparency 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Service tiers and SLA concepts are explained, while final rates, deposits and detailed managed-service scope remain proposal based.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Payment and deposit transparency within pricing & commercial transparency.
Value competitiveness 4/5
Strong evidence. Service tiers and SLA concepts are explained, while final rates, deposits and detailed managed-service scope remain proposal based.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Value competitiveness within pricing & commercial transparency.
Managed services and projects are custom scoped. Resolute publishes service-pricing guidance and promotes contractually guaranteed service levels.
View pricing sourceRequest the SLA credit structure, included onsite coverage, named escalation roles and the boundary between managed services and billable projects.
Verified digital footprint
Only profiles identified for this specific company are included.
Review profiles
Directory profiles
AI
Avenir IT
400-141 Bannatyne Avenue, Winnipeg, MB R3B 0R3
Avenir IT competes on accessibility and a distinctly local service model. Its no-long-term-contract promise, live local technicians and straightforward support language are well suited to owners and managers who want fewer layers between the business and the people fixing its technology.
Winnipeg small and mid-sized businesses that want a hands-on local team and flexible agreements.
Strong local reviews, no long-term contracts and explicit on-time, on-budget and satisfaction promises.
Older reputation profiles still show a Des Meurons address, while the official site and Yellow Pages align on Bannatyne Avenue.
- Local partnership
- Quick response
- Straightforward dealings
- Helpful guidance
- Attentive customer care
82.4 out of 100
Open any category, then expand an individual factor to see why it received its score and follow the supporting source.
A. Identity & local presence
The official site and Yellow Pages agree on the Bannatyne office, phone and early weekday opening, while older profiles retain a prior address.
Show 5 scoring factors and reasoning
Google Business Profile completeness and control 4/5
Strong evidence. The official site and Yellow Pages agree on the Bannatyne office, phone and early weekday opening, while older profiles retain a prior address.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Google Business Profile completeness and control within identity & local presence.
Name, address and phone consistency 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. The official site and Yellow Pages agree on the Bannatyne office, phone and early weekday opening, while older profiles retain a prior address.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Name, address and phone consistency within identity & local presence.
Local service-area clarity 5/5
Excellent evidence. The official site and Yellow Pages agree on the Bannatyne office, phone and early weekday opening, while older profiles retain a prior address.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Local service-area clarity within identity & local presence.
Hours and availability 5/5
Excellent evidence. The official site and Yellow Pages agree on the Bannatyne office, phone and early weekday opening, while older profiles retain a prior address.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Hours and availability within identity & local presence.
Local search discoverability 4/5
Strong evidence. The official site and Yellow Pages agree on the Bannatyne office, phone and early weekday opening, while older profiles retain a prior address.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Local search discoverability within identity & local presence.
B. Review strength
A 4.9 rating across 100 reviews creates a strong local signal, reinforced by named customer testimonials.
Show 6 scoring factors and reasoning
Rating strength 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 4.9 rating across 100 reviews creates a strong local signal, reinforced by named customer testimonials.
- Weighted result
- 3.0 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Rating strength within review strength.
Review volume versus the market 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 4.9 rating across 100 reviews creates a strong local signal, reinforced by named customer testimonials.
- Weighted result
- 3.0 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review volume versus the market within review strength.
Review recency and cadence 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. A 4.9 rating across 100 reviews creates a strong local signal, reinforced by named customer testimonials.
- Weighted result
- 1.8 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review recency and cadence within review strength.
Review-platform diversity 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. A 4.9 rating across 100 reviews creates a strong local signal, reinforced by named customer testimonials.
- Weighted result
- 1.8 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review-platform diversity within review strength.
Sentiment depth 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 4.9 rating across 100 reviews creates a strong local signal, reinforced by named customer testimonials.
- Weighted result
- 3.0 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Sentiment depth within review strength.
Critical-review rate and severity 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 4.9 rating across 100 reviews creates a strong local signal, reinforced by named customer testimonials.
- Weighted result
- 3.0 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Critical-review rate and severity within review strength.
C. Review trust & integrity
The review identity is coherent and sentiment is detailed, though owner-response visibility is limited in the accessible profile.
Show 5 scoring factors and reasoning
Review authenticity risk 4/5
Strong evidence. The review identity is coherent and sentiment is detailed, though owner-response visibility is limited in the accessible profile.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review authenticity risk within review trust & integrity.
Owner response behaviour 2/5
Limited public evidence. The review identity is coherent and sentiment is detailed, though owner-response visibility is limited in the accessible profile.
- Weighted result
- 0.8 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Owner response behaviour within review trust & integrity.
Complaint-resolution evidence 4/5
Strong evidence. The review identity is coherent and sentiment is detailed, though owner-response visibility is limited in the accessible profile.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Complaint-resolution evidence within review trust & integrity.
Review-collection compliance 4/5
Strong evidence. The review identity is coherent and sentiment is detailed, though owner-response visibility is limited in the accessible profile.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review-collection compliance within review trust & integrity.
Duplicate and identity integrity 5/5
Excellent evidence. The review identity is coherent and sentiment is detailed, though owner-response visibility is limited in the accessible profile.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Duplicate and identity integrity within review trust & integrity.
D. Online reputation risk
A 2008 founding and stable local footprint support continuity, with no material adverse pattern found in the reviewed evidence.
Show 5 scoring factors and reasoning
BBB and consumer-complaint risk 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 2008 founding and stable local footprint support continuity, with no material adverse pattern found in the reviewed evidence.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- BBB and consumer-complaint risk within online reputation risk.
Legal and regulatory risk 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 2008 founding and stable local footprint support continuity, with no material adverse pattern found in the reviewed evidence.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Legal and regulatory risk within online reputation risk.
Scam and adverse-media risk 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 2008 founding and stable local footprint support continuity, with no material adverse pattern found in the reviewed evidence.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Scam and adverse-media risk within online reputation risk.
Service-incident signals 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 2008 founding and stable local footprint support continuity, with no material adverse pattern found in the reviewed evidence.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Service-incident signals within online reputation risk.
Continuity and stability 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 2008 founding and stable local footprint support continuity, with no material adverse pattern found in the reviewed evidence.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Continuity and stability within online reputation risk.
E. Service fit & expertise
Managed IT, co-managed support, cybersecurity, continuity and voice services are clear; public credential and case-study depth is more modest.
Show 6 scoring factors and reasoning
Service clarity 5/5
Excellent evidence. Managed IT, co-managed support, cybersecurity, continuity and voice services are clear; public credential and case-study depth is more modest.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Service clarity within service fit & expertise.
Specialization 4/5
Strong evidence. Managed IT, co-managed support, cybersecurity, continuity and voice services are clear; public credential and case-study depth is more modest.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Specialization within service fit & expertise.
Credentials and certifications 2/5
Limited public evidence. Managed IT, co-managed support, cybersecurity, continuity and voice services are clear; public credential and case-study depth is more modest.
- Weighted result
- 0.8 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Credentials and certifications within service fit & expertise.
Case studies and proof 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Managed IT, co-managed support, cybersecurity, continuity and voice services are clear; public credential and case-study depth is more modest.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Case studies and proof within service fit & expertise.
Staff expertise 4/5
Strong evidence. Managed IT, co-managed support, cybersecurity, continuity and voice services are clear; public credential and case-study depth is more modest.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Staff expertise within service fit & expertise.
Outcome evidence 4/5
Strong evidence. Managed IT, co-managed support, cybersecurity, continuity and voice services are clear; public credential and case-study depth is more modest.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Outcome evidence within service fit & expertise.
F. Customer experience signals
Live local technicians, flexible contracts, 24/7 monitoring and clear service promises create an excellent customer-experience score.
Show 6 scoring factors and reasoning
Contact accessibility 5/5
Excellent evidence. Live local technicians, flexible contracts, 24/7 monitoring and clear service promises create an excellent customer-experience score.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Contact accessibility within customer experience signals.
Response speed 5/5
Excellent evidence. Live local technicians, flexible contracts, 24/7 monitoring and clear service promises create an excellent customer-experience score.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Response speed within customer experience signals.
Quote and intake quality 5/5
Excellent evidence. Live local technicians, flexible contracts, 24/7 monitoring and clear service promises create an excellent customer-experience score.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Quote and intake quality within customer experience signals.
Pricing and value before contact 5/5
Excellent evidence. Live local technicians, flexible contracts, 24/7 monitoring and clear service promises create an excellent customer-experience score.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Pricing and value before contact within customer experience signals.
Policies and guarantees 5/5
Excellent evidence. Live local technicians, flexible contracts, 24/7 monitoring and clear service promises create an excellent customer-experience score.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Policies and guarantees within customer experience signals.
Communication and professionalism 5/5
Excellent evidence. Live local technicians, flexible contracts, 24/7 monitoring and clear service promises create an excellent customer-experience score.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Communication and professionalism within customer experience signals.
G. Website & technical trust
The site is secure, clear and current, with room for stronger structured data and broader technical proof.
Show 4 scoring factors and reasoning
HTTPS, mobile and site availability 5/5
Excellent evidence. The site is secure, clear and current, with room for stronger structured data and broader technical proof.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- HTTPS, mobile and site availability within website & technical trust.
Content freshness 4/5
Strong evidence. The site is secure, clear and current, with room for stronger structured data and broader technical proof.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Content freshness within website & technical trust.
Structured data and search readiness 2/5
Limited public evidence. The site is secure, clear and current, with room for stronger structured data and broader technical proof.
- Weighted result
- 0.8 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Structured data and search readiness within website & technical trust.
Privacy, legal and accessibility 5/5
Excellent evidence. The site is secure, clear and current, with room for stronger structured data and broader technical proof.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Privacy, legal and accessibility within website & technical trust.
H. Authority & third-party validation
Directory and award signals are present, but earned media, credentials and partner depth are less visible than at the national firms.
Show 4 scoring factors and reasoning
Directory presence 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Directory and award signals are present, but earned media, credentials and partner depth are less visible than at the national firms.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Directory presence within authority & third-party validation.
Awards and recognition 2/5
Limited public evidence. Directory and award signals are present, but earned media, credentials and partner depth are less visible than at the national firms.
- Weighted result
- 0.8 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Awards and recognition within authority & third-party validation.
Earned media and backlinks 2/5
Limited public evidence. Directory and award signals are present, but earned media, credentials and partner depth are less visible than at the national firms.
- Weighted result
- 0.8 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Earned media and backlinks within authority & third-party validation.
Partner ecosystem 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Directory and award signals are present, but earned media, credentials and partner depth are less visible than at the national firms.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Partner ecosystem within authority & third-party validation.
I. Social, content & community proof
Avenir publishes useful local IT content and maintains several recognizable social accounts.
Show 3 scoring factors and reasoning
Social legitimacy and activity 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Avenir publishes useful local IT content and maintains several recognizable social accounts.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Social legitimacy and activity within social, content & community proof.
Educational content 4/5
Strong evidence. Avenir publishes useful local IT content and maintains several recognizable social accounts.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Educational content within social, content & community proof.
Community involvement 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Avenir publishes useful local IT content and maintains several recognizable social accounts.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Community involvement within social, content & community proof.
J. Pricing & commercial transparency
No-long-term-contract and no-surprise-billing promises are unusually clear, while exact rates remain tailored.
Show 3 scoring factors and reasoning
Contract, scope and terms clarity 5/5
Excellent evidence. No-long-term-contract and no-surprise-billing promises are unusually clear, while exact rates remain tailored.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Contract, scope and terms clarity within pricing & commercial transparency.
Payment and deposit transparency 5/5
Excellent evidence. No-long-term-contract and no-surprise-billing promises are unusually clear, while exact rates remain tailored.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Payment and deposit transparency within pricing & commercial transparency.
Value competitiveness 4/5
Strong evidence. No-long-term-contract and no-surprise-billing promises are unusually clear, while exact rates remain tailored.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Value competitiveness within pricing & commercial transparency.
Avenir promotes all-inclusive support without long-term contracts or nickel-and-diming. Exact monthly rates are custom quoted.
View pricing sourceConfirm the month-to-month exit process, onboarding charge, included projects, emergency response terms and any per-user or per-device minimums.
Verified digital footprint
Only profiles identified for this specific company are included.
Review profiles
Directory profiles
ET
Exchange Technology Services
1558 Wilson Place, Winnipeg, MB R3T 0Y4
Exchange Technology Services has the clearest security-operations story among the Winnipeg-headquartered providers. Its in-house SOC, broad managed service catalogue and compliance credentials make it especially relevant where a buyer wants local security operations instead of a separate national security vendor.
Manitoba organizations that prioritize a local SOC, 24/7 coverage, compliance support and broad one-provider capability.
A Winnipeg SOC, stated response under 15 minutes, local data residency and strong ISO and SOC credentials.
The official site lists Wilson Place while several review and directory profiles still show the former Lorimer Boulevard office.
- Strong technical expertise
- Friendly team
- Prompt resolution
- Client confidence
- Reliable ongoing support
82.2 out of 100
Open any category, then expand an individual factor to see why it received its score and follow the supporting source.
A. Identity & local presence
Winnipeg headquarters and local coverage are clear, but Wilson Place conflicts with older Lorimer Boulevard listing data.
Show 5 scoring factors and reasoning
Google Business Profile completeness and control 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Winnipeg headquarters and local coverage are clear, but Wilson Place conflicts with older Lorimer Boulevard listing data.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Google Business Profile completeness and control within identity & local presence.
Name, address and phone consistency 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Winnipeg headquarters and local coverage are clear, but Wilson Place conflicts with older Lorimer Boulevard listing data.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Name, address and phone consistency within identity & local presence.
Local service-area clarity 5/5
Excellent evidence. Winnipeg headquarters and local coverage are clear, but Wilson Place conflicts with older Lorimer Boulevard listing data.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Local service-area clarity within identity & local presence.
Hours and availability 5/5
Excellent evidence. Winnipeg headquarters and local coverage are clear, but Wilson Place conflicts with older Lorimer Boulevard listing data.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Hours and availability within identity & local presence.
Local search discoverability 4/5
Strong evidence. Winnipeg headquarters and local coverage are clear, but Wilson Place conflicts with older Lorimer Boulevard listing data.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Local search discoverability within identity & local presence.
B. Review strength
A 5.0 rating across 51 reviews is a strong aggregate signal, with accessible platform summaries emphasizing expertise, speed and professionalism.
Show 6 scoring factors and reasoning
Rating strength 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 5.0 rating across 51 reviews is a strong aggregate signal, with accessible platform summaries emphasizing expertise, speed and professionalism.
- Weighted result
- 3.0 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Rating strength within review strength.
Review volume versus the market 4/5
Strong evidence. A 5.0 rating across 51 reviews is a strong aggregate signal, with accessible platform summaries emphasizing expertise, speed and professionalism.
- Weighted result
- 2.4 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review volume versus the market within review strength.
Review recency and cadence 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. A 5.0 rating across 51 reviews is a strong aggregate signal, with accessible platform summaries emphasizing expertise, speed and professionalism.
- Weighted result
- 1.8 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review recency and cadence within review strength.
Review-platform diversity 2/5
Limited public evidence. A 5.0 rating across 51 reviews is a strong aggregate signal, with accessible platform summaries emphasizing expertise, speed and professionalism.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review-platform diversity within review strength.
Sentiment depth 4/5
Strong evidence. A 5.0 rating across 51 reviews is a strong aggregate signal, with accessible platform summaries emphasizing expertise, speed and professionalism.
- Weighted result
- 2.4 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Sentiment depth within review strength.
Critical-review rate and severity 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 5.0 rating across 51 reviews is a strong aggregate signal, with accessible platform summaries emphasizing expertise, speed and professionalism.
- Weighted result
- 3.0 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Critical-review rate and severity within review strength.
C. Review trust & integrity
Review sentiment is coherent, though the accessible source summarizes themes rather than exposing a large set of individual permalinks.
Show 5 scoring factors and reasoning
Review authenticity risk 4/5
Strong evidence. Review sentiment is coherent, though the accessible source summarizes themes rather than exposing a large set of individual permalinks.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review authenticity risk within review trust & integrity.
Owner response behaviour 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Review sentiment is coherent, though the accessible source summarizes themes rather than exposing a large set of individual permalinks.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Owner response behaviour within review trust & integrity.
Complaint-resolution evidence 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Review sentiment is coherent, though the accessible source summarizes themes rather than exposing a large set of individual permalinks.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Complaint-resolution evidence within review trust & integrity.
Review-collection compliance 4/5
Strong evidence. Review sentiment is coherent, though the accessible source summarizes themes rather than exposing a large set of individual permalinks.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review-collection compliance within review trust & integrity.
Duplicate and identity integrity 4/5
Strong evidence. Review sentiment is coherent, though the accessible source summarizes themes rather than exposing a large set of individual permalinks.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Duplicate and identity integrity within review trust & integrity.
D. Online reputation risk
ISO 27001, SOC 2 and a stable operating platform reduce risk, with only limited public service-incident evidence.
Show 5 scoring factors and reasoning
BBB and consumer-complaint risk 5/5
Excellent evidence. ISO 27001, SOC 2 and a stable operating platform reduce risk, with only limited public service-incident evidence.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- BBB and consumer-complaint risk within online reputation risk.
Legal and regulatory risk 5/5
Excellent evidence. ISO 27001, SOC 2 and a stable operating platform reduce risk, with only limited public service-incident evidence.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Legal and regulatory risk within online reputation risk.
Scam and adverse-media risk 5/5
Excellent evidence. ISO 27001, SOC 2 and a stable operating platform reduce risk, with only limited public service-incident evidence.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Scam and adverse-media risk within online reputation risk.
Service-incident signals 4/5
Strong evidence. ISO 27001, SOC 2 and a stable operating platform reduce risk, with only limited public service-incident evidence.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Service-incident signals within online reputation risk.
Continuity and stability 4/5
Strong evidence. ISO 27001, SOC 2 and a stable operating platform reduce risk, with only limited public service-incident evidence.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Continuity and stability within online reputation risk.
E. Service fit & expertise
Managed IT, a local SOC, MDR, compliance, cloud, networks, data and project delivery form one of the broadest local service stacks.
Show 6 scoring factors and reasoning
Service clarity 5/5
Excellent evidence. Managed IT, a local SOC, MDR, compliance, cloud, networks, data and project delivery form one of the broadest local service stacks.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Service clarity within service fit & expertise.
Specialization 5/5
Excellent evidence. Managed IT, a local SOC, MDR, compliance, cloud, networks, data and project delivery form one of the broadest local service stacks.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Specialization within service fit & expertise.
Credentials and certifications 5/5
Excellent evidence. Managed IT, a local SOC, MDR, compliance, cloud, networks, data and project delivery form one of the broadest local service stacks.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Credentials and certifications within service fit & expertise.
Case studies and proof 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Managed IT, a local SOC, MDR, compliance, cloud, networks, data and project delivery form one of the broadest local service stacks.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Case studies and proof within service fit & expertise.
Staff expertise 4/5
Strong evidence. Managed IT, a local SOC, MDR, compliance, cloud, networks, data and project delivery form one of the broadest local service stacks.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Staff expertise within service fit & expertise.
Outcome evidence 4/5
Strong evidence. Managed IT, a local SOC, MDR, compliance, cloud, networks, data and project delivery form one of the broadest local service stacks.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Outcome evidence within service fit & expertise.
F. Customer experience signals
The 24/7 model, rapid-response claim, assessment path and strong review themes support a mature customer experience.
Show 6 scoring factors and reasoning
Contact accessibility 5/5
Excellent evidence. The 24/7 model, rapid-response claim, assessment path and strong review themes support a mature customer experience.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Contact accessibility within customer experience signals.
Response speed 5/5
Excellent evidence. The 24/7 model, rapid-response claim, assessment path and strong review themes support a mature customer experience.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Response speed within customer experience signals.
Quote and intake quality 5/5
Excellent evidence. The 24/7 model, rapid-response claim, assessment path and strong review themes support a mature customer experience.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Quote and intake quality within customer experience signals.
Pricing and value before contact 4/5
Strong evidence. The 24/7 model, rapid-response claim, assessment path and strong review themes support a mature customer experience.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Pricing and value before contact within customer experience signals.
Policies and guarantees 4/5
Strong evidence. The 24/7 model, rapid-response claim, assessment path and strong review themes support a mature customer experience.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Policies and guarantees within customer experience signals.
Communication and professionalism 4/5
Strong evidence. The 24/7 model, rapid-response claim, assessment path and strong review themes support a mature customer experience.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Communication and professionalism within customer experience signals.
G. Website & technical trust
The official site is secure, current and detailed across security, managed services and company evidence.
Show 4 scoring factors and reasoning
HTTPS, mobile and site availability 5/5
Excellent evidence. The official site is secure, current and detailed across security, managed services and company evidence.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- HTTPS, mobile and site availability within website & technical trust.
Content freshness 5/5
Excellent evidence. The official site is secure, current and detailed across security, managed services and company evidence.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Content freshness within website & technical trust.
Structured data and search readiness 4/5
Strong evidence. The official site is secure, current and detailed across security, managed services and company evidence.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Structured data and search readiness within website & technical trust.
Privacy, legal and accessibility 4/5
Strong evidence. The official site is secure, current and detailed across security, managed services and company evidence.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Privacy, legal and accessibility within website & technical trust.
H. Authority & third-party validation
ISO and SOC credentials plus major technology partnerships provide strong third-party and ecosystem validation.
Show 4 scoring factors and reasoning
Directory presence 5/5
Excellent evidence. ISO and SOC credentials plus major technology partnerships provide strong third-party and ecosystem validation.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Directory presence within authority & third-party validation.
Awards and recognition 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. ISO and SOC credentials plus major technology partnerships provide strong third-party and ecosystem validation.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Awards and recognition within authority & third-party validation.
Earned media and backlinks 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. ISO and SOC credentials plus major technology partnerships provide strong third-party and ecosystem validation.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Earned media and backlinks within authority & third-party validation.
Partner ecosystem 5/5
Excellent evidence. ISO and SOC credentials plus major technology partnerships provide strong third-party and ecosystem validation.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Partner ecosystem within authority & third-party validation.
I. Social, content & community proof
Professional social and educational activity is visible, though community proof is less prominent than the technical story.
Show 3 scoring factors and reasoning
Social legitimacy and activity 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Professional social and educational activity is visible, though community proof is less prominent than the technical story.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Social legitimacy and activity within social, content & community proof.
Educational content 4/5
Strong evidence. Professional social and educational activity is visible, though community proof is less prominent than the technical story.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Educational content within social, content & community proof.
Community involvement 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Professional social and educational activity is visible, though community proof is less prominent than the technical story.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Community involvement within social, content & community proof.
J. Pricing & commercial transparency
Flat monthly pricing and a free assessment are clear; detailed inclusions and final rates remain proposal based.
Show 3 scoring factors and reasoning
Contract, scope and terms clarity 5/5
Excellent evidence. Flat monthly pricing and a free assessment are clear; detailed inclusions and final rates remain proposal based.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Contract, scope and terms clarity within pricing & commercial transparency.
Payment and deposit transparency 4/5
Strong evidence. Flat monthly pricing and a free assessment are clear; detailed inclusions and final rates remain proposal based.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Payment and deposit transparency within pricing & commercial transparency.
Value competitiveness 4/5
Strong evidence. Flat monthly pricing and a free assessment are clear; detailed inclusions and final rates remain proposal based.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Value competitiveness within pricing & commercial transparency.
Exchange promotes flat monthly pricing for managed services and offers a free IT and security assessment. Final rates are tailored.
View pricing sourceAsk which SOC response actions are included, where data and logs reside, how onsite work is billed and what compliance reporting comes standard.
Verified digital footprint
Only profiles identified for this specific company are included.
Review profiles
Directory profiles
WT
WBM Technologies
100-175 Hargrave Street, Winnipeg, MB R3C 3R8
WBM is the scale option in this comparison. Its 500-plus-person team, Western Canadian operating footprint and deep enterprise service catalogue are designed for complex estates, multi-site operations and public-sector environments rather than the smaller end of the SMB market.
Large enterprises and public-sector organizations that need scale, lifecycle coverage and multi-site delivery.
The largest Western Canadian delivery platform in the field, with more than 75 years in business and an award-winning service desk.
A reliable Winnipeg GBP rating and review count were not visible in the accessible public sources; the strongest independent review evidence is one detailed Clutch relationship.
- Stable operations
- Cybersecurity adoption
- Responsive delivery
- Ability to adapt
- Strong working relationships
81.8 out of 100
Open any category, then expand an individual factor to see why it received its score and follow the supporting source.
A. Identity & local presence
The Hargrave Street office and local phone are consistent, while Winnipeg-specific public hours and live GBP metrics are less visible.
Show 5 scoring factors and reasoning
Google Business Profile completeness and control 5/5
Excellent evidence. The Hargrave Street office and local phone are consistent, while Winnipeg-specific public hours and live GBP metrics are less visible.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Google Business Profile completeness and control within identity & local presence.
Name, address and phone consistency 4/5
Strong evidence. The Hargrave Street office and local phone are consistent, while Winnipeg-specific public hours and live GBP metrics are less visible.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Name, address and phone consistency within identity & local presence.
Local service-area clarity 5/5
Excellent evidence. The Hargrave Street office and local phone are consistent, while Winnipeg-specific public hours and live GBP metrics are less visible.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Local service-area clarity within identity & local presence.
Hours and availability 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. The Hargrave Street office and local phone are consistent, while Winnipeg-specific public hours and live GBP metrics are less visible.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Hours and availability within identity & local presence.
Local search discoverability 4/5
Strong evidence. The Hargrave Street office and local phone are consistent, while Winnipeg-specific public hours and live GBP metrics are less visible.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Local search discoverability within identity & local presence.
B. Review strength
One verified Clutch review provides unusually deep relationship evidence, but the accessible public review sample lacks breadth.
Show 6 scoring factors and reasoning
Rating strength 4/5
Strong evidence. One verified Clutch review provides unusually deep relationship evidence, but the accessible public review sample lacks breadth.
- Weighted result
- 2.4 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Rating strength within review strength.
Review volume versus the market 0/5
Not found in the reviewed evidence. One verified Clutch review provides unusually deep relationship evidence, but the accessible public review sample lacks breadth.
- Weighted result
- 0.0 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review volume versus the market within review strength.
Review recency and cadence 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. One verified Clutch review provides unusually deep relationship evidence, but the accessible public review sample lacks breadth.
- Weighted result
- 1.8 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review recency and cadence within review strength.
Review-platform diversity 1/5
Minimal public evidence. One verified Clutch review provides unusually deep relationship evidence, but the accessible public review sample lacks breadth.
- Weighted result
- 0.6 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review-platform diversity within review strength.
Sentiment depth 4/5
Strong evidence. One verified Clutch review provides unusually deep relationship evidence, but the accessible public review sample lacks breadth.
- Weighted result
- 2.4 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Sentiment depth within review strength.
Critical-review rate and severity 5/5
Excellent evidence. One verified Clutch review provides unusually deep relationship evidence, but the accessible public review sample lacks breadth.
- Weighted result
- 3.0 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Critical-review rate and severity within review strength.
C. Review trust & integrity
The verified review is detailed and credible; owner-response and multi-platform review evidence are limited.
Show 5 scoring factors and reasoning
Review authenticity risk 5/5
Excellent evidence. The verified review is detailed and credible; owner-response and multi-platform review evidence are limited.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review authenticity risk within review trust & integrity.
Owner response behaviour 1/5
Minimal public evidence. The verified review is detailed and credible; owner-response and multi-platform review evidence are limited.
- Weighted result
- 0.4 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Owner response behaviour within review trust & integrity.
Complaint-resolution evidence 4/5
Strong evidence. The verified review is detailed and credible; owner-response and multi-platform review evidence are limited.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Complaint-resolution evidence within review trust & integrity.
Review-collection compliance 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. The verified review is detailed and credible; owner-response and multi-platform review evidence are limited.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review-collection compliance within review trust & integrity.
Duplicate and identity integrity 5/5
Excellent evidence. The verified review is detailed and credible; owner-response and multi-platform review evidence are limited.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Duplicate and identity integrity within review trust & integrity.
D. Online reputation risk
A 75-plus-year history, large regional footprint and enterprise client base provide excellent continuity and risk signals.
Show 5 scoring factors and reasoning
BBB and consumer-complaint risk 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 75-plus-year history, large regional footprint and enterprise client base provide excellent continuity and risk signals.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- BBB and consumer-complaint risk within online reputation risk.
Legal and regulatory risk 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 75-plus-year history, large regional footprint and enterprise client base provide excellent continuity and risk signals.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Legal and regulatory risk within online reputation risk.
Scam and adverse-media risk 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 75-plus-year history, large regional footprint and enterprise client base provide excellent continuity and risk signals.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Scam and adverse-media risk within online reputation risk.
Service-incident signals 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 75-plus-year history, large regional footprint and enterprise client base provide excellent continuity and risk signals.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Service-incident signals within online reputation risk.
Continuity and stability 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 75-plus-year history, large regional footprint and enterprise client base provide excellent continuity and risk signals.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Continuity and stability within online reputation risk.
E. Service fit & expertise
WBM covers managed IT, cyber, workplace, AI, service desk, procurement and print at enterprise scale.
Show 6 scoring factors and reasoning
Service clarity 5/5
Excellent evidence. WBM covers managed IT, cyber, workplace, AI, service desk, procurement and print at enterprise scale.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Service clarity within service fit & expertise.
Specialization 5/5
Excellent evidence. WBM covers managed IT, cyber, workplace, AI, service desk, procurement and print at enterprise scale.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Specialization within service fit & expertise.
Credentials and certifications 5/5
Excellent evidence. WBM covers managed IT, cyber, workplace, AI, service desk, procurement and print at enterprise scale.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Credentials and certifications within service fit & expertise.
Case studies and proof 5/5
Excellent evidence. WBM covers managed IT, cyber, workplace, AI, service desk, procurement and print at enterprise scale.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Case studies and proof within service fit & expertise.
Staff expertise 5/5
Excellent evidence. WBM covers managed IT, cyber, workplace, AI, service desk, procurement and print at enterprise scale.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Staff expertise within service fit & expertise.
Outcome evidence 5/5
Excellent evidence. WBM covers managed IT, cyber, workplace, AI, service desk, procurement and print at enterprise scale.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Outcome evidence within service fit & expertise.
F. Customer experience signals
The verified client account praises responsiveness and adaptability, while pre-contact pricing and intake detail are limited.
Show 6 scoring factors and reasoning
Contact accessibility 5/5
Excellent evidence. The verified client account praises responsiveness and adaptability, while pre-contact pricing and intake detail are limited.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Contact accessibility within customer experience signals.
Response speed 4/5
Strong evidence. The verified client account praises responsiveness and adaptability, while pre-contact pricing and intake detail are limited.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Response speed within customer experience signals.
Quote and intake quality 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. The verified client account praises responsiveness and adaptability, while pre-contact pricing and intake detail are limited.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Quote and intake quality within customer experience signals.
Pricing and value before contact 2/5
Limited public evidence. The verified client account praises responsiveness and adaptability, while pre-contact pricing and intake detail are limited.
- Weighted result
- 0.8 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Pricing and value before contact within customer experience signals.
Policies and guarantees 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. The verified client account praises responsiveness and adaptability, while pre-contact pricing and intake detail are limited.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Policies and guarantees within customer experience signals.
Communication and professionalism 5/5
Excellent evidence. The verified client account praises responsiveness and adaptability, while pre-contact pricing and intake detail are limited.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Communication and professionalism within customer experience signals.
G. Website & technical trust
The corporate site is secure, current and authoritative, but structured-data evidence was not strong in the reviewed crawl.
Show 4 scoring factors and reasoning
HTTPS, mobile and site availability 5/5
Excellent evidence. The corporate site is secure, current and authoritative, but structured-data evidence was not strong in the reviewed crawl.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- HTTPS, mobile and site availability within website & technical trust.
Content freshness 5/5
Excellent evidence. The corporate site is secure, current and authoritative, but structured-data evidence was not strong in the reviewed crawl.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Content freshness within website & technical trust.
Structured data and search readiness 2/5
Limited public evidence. The corporate site is secure, current and authoritative, but structured-data evidence was not strong in the reviewed crawl.
- Weighted result
- 0.8 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Structured data and search readiness within website & technical trust.
Privacy, legal and accessibility 5/5
Excellent evidence. The corporate site is secure, current and authoritative, but structured-data evidence was not strong in the reviewed crawl.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Privacy, legal and accessibility within website & technical trust.
H. Authority & third-party validation
Awards, enterprise partnerships, SOC 2 operations and a broad directory footprint create a top-tier authority score.
Show 4 scoring factors and reasoning
Directory presence 5/5
Excellent evidence. Awards, enterprise partnerships, SOC 2 operations and a broad directory footprint create a top-tier authority score.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Directory presence within authority & third-party validation.
Awards and recognition 5/5
Excellent evidence. Awards, enterprise partnerships, SOC 2 operations and a broad directory footprint create a top-tier authority score.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Awards and recognition within authority & third-party validation.
Earned media and backlinks 5/5
Excellent evidence. Awards, enterprise partnerships, SOC 2 operations and a broad directory footprint create a top-tier authority score.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Earned media and backlinks within authority & third-party validation.
Partner ecosystem 5/5
Excellent evidence. Awards, enterprise partnerships, SOC 2 operations and a broad directory footprint create a top-tier authority score.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Partner ecosystem within authority & third-party validation.
I. Social, content & community proof
WBM maintains active professional channels, extensive educational content and visible community involvement.
Show 3 scoring factors and reasoning
Social legitimacy and activity 5/5
Excellent evidence. WBM maintains active professional channels, extensive educational content and visible community involvement.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Social legitimacy and activity within social, content & community proof.
Educational content 5/5
Excellent evidence. WBM maintains active professional channels, extensive educational content and visible community involvement.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Educational content within social, content & community proof.
Community involvement 5/5
Excellent evidence. WBM maintains active professional channels, extensive educational content and visible community involvement.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Community involvement within social, content & community proof.
J. Pricing & commercial transparency
Directory benchmarks help frame project cost, but enterprise scope, contract and payment detail remain custom.
Show 3 scoring factors and reasoning
Contract, scope and terms clarity 4/5
Strong evidence. Directory benchmarks help frame project cost, but enterprise scope, contract and payment detail remain custom.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Contract, scope and terms clarity within pricing & commercial transparency.
Payment and deposit transparency 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Directory benchmarks help frame project cost, but enterprise scope, contract and payment detail remain custom.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Payment and deposit transparency within pricing & commercial transparency.
Value competitiveness 4/5
Strong evidence. Directory benchmarks help frame project cost, but enterprise scope, contract and payment detail remain custom.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Value competitiveness within pricing & commercial transparency.
Clutch lists a $5,000+ project minimum and a $100 to $149 hourly benchmark. Enterprise managed-service pricing is custom scoped.
View pricing sourceRequest a site-by-site scope, named service levels, transition plan, asset and licensing assumptions, and clarity on project versus recurring work.
HT
HUB Technology Solutions
Unit G-301 Weston Street, Winnipeg, MB R3E 3H4
HUB brings a long local history and a clear ownership story to the Winnipeg market. The company is Canadian, Indigenous and locally operated, with a consultative service model that fits organizations looking for a close working relationship rather than a large national delivery structure.
Manitoba SMBs, Indigenous organizations and local institutions that prioritize local ownership and personal service.
Thirty-five years of local service combined with Canadian, Indigenous and Winnipeg ownership.
Public commercial terms and measurable service commitments are less detailed than those of the most transparent competitors.
- Fast professional help
- Smooth onboarding
- Remote-work enablement
- Consultative advice
- Long-term reliability
81.4 out of 100
Open any category, then expand an individual factor to see why it received its score and follow the supporting source.
A. Identity & local presence
The Weston Street address, phone and Winnipeg identity are consistent, with a small hours discrepancy between official and directory sources.
Show 5 scoring factors and reasoning
Google Business Profile completeness and control 5/5
Excellent evidence. The Weston Street address, phone and Winnipeg identity are consistent, with a small hours discrepancy between official and directory sources.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Google Business Profile completeness and control within identity & local presence.
Name, address and phone consistency 5/5
Excellent evidence. The Weston Street address, phone and Winnipeg identity are consistent, with a small hours discrepancy between official and directory sources.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Name, address and phone consistency within identity & local presence.
Local service-area clarity 5/5
Excellent evidence. The Weston Street address, phone and Winnipeg identity are consistent, with a small hours discrepancy between official and directory sources.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Local service-area clarity within identity & local presence.
Hours and availability 4/5
Strong evidence. The Weston Street address, phone and Winnipeg identity are consistent, with a small hours discrepancy between official and directory sources.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Hours and availability within identity & local presence.
Local search discoverability 4/5
Strong evidence. The Weston Street address, phone and Winnipeg identity are consistent, with a small hours discrepancy between official and directory sources.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Local search discoverability within identity & local presence.
B. Review strength
A 4.8 rating and 18-review profile show positive local sentiment around speed, professionalism, transitions and advice.
Show 6 scoring factors and reasoning
Rating strength 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 4.8 rating and 18-review profile show positive local sentiment around speed, professionalism, transitions and advice.
- Weighted result
- 3.0 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Rating strength within review strength.
Review volume versus the market 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. A 4.8 rating and 18-review profile show positive local sentiment around speed, professionalism, transitions and advice.
- Weighted result
- 1.8 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review volume versus the market within review strength.
Review recency and cadence 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. A 4.8 rating and 18-review profile show positive local sentiment around speed, professionalism, transitions and advice.
- Weighted result
- 1.8 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review recency and cadence within review strength.
Review-platform diversity 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. A 4.8 rating and 18-review profile show positive local sentiment around speed, professionalism, transitions and advice.
- Weighted result
- 1.8 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review-platform diversity within review strength.
Sentiment depth 4/5
Strong evidence. A 4.8 rating and 18-review profile show positive local sentiment around speed, professionalism, transitions and advice.
- Weighted result
- 2.4 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Sentiment depth within review strength.
Critical-review rate and severity 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 4.8 rating and 18-review profile show positive local sentiment around speed, professionalism, transitions and advice.
- Weighted result
- 3.0 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Critical-review rate and severity within review strength.
C. Review trust & integrity
Review themes are coherent and low risk, with moderate visibility into responses and individual review permalinks.
Show 5 scoring factors and reasoning
Review authenticity risk 4/5
Strong evidence. Review themes are coherent and low risk, with moderate visibility into responses and individual review permalinks.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review authenticity risk within review trust & integrity.
Owner response behaviour 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Review themes are coherent and low risk, with moderate visibility into responses and individual review permalinks.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Owner response behaviour within review trust & integrity.
Complaint-resolution evidence 4/5
Strong evidence. Review themes are coherent and low risk, with moderate visibility into responses and individual review permalinks.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Complaint-resolution evidence within review trust & integrity.
Review-collection compliance 4/5
Strong evidence. Review themes are coherent and low risk, with moderate visibility into responses and individual review permalinks.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review-collection compliance within review trust & integrity.
Duplicate and identity integrity 5/5
Excellent evidence. Review themes are coherent and low risk, with moderate visibility into responses and individual review permalinks.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Duplicate and identity integrity within review trust & integrity.
D. Online reputation risk
A 35-year local history and stable ownership profile support a strong continuity assessment.
Show 5 scoring factors and reasoning
BBB and consumer-complaint risk 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 35-year local history and stable ownership profile support a strong continuity assessment.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- BBB and consumer-complaint risk within online reputation risk.
Legal and regulatory risk 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 35-year local history and stable ownership profile support a strong continuity assessment.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Legal and regulatory risk within online reputation risk.
Scam and adverse-media risk 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 35-year local history and stable ownership profile support a strong continuity assessment.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Scam and adverse-media risk within online reputation risk.
Service-incident signals 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 35-year local history and stable ownership profile support a strong continuity assessment.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Service-incident signals within online reputation risk.
Continuity and stability 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 35-year local history and stable ownership profile support a strong continuity assessment.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Continuity and stability within online reputation risk.
E. Service fit & expertise
Managed infrastructure, cybersecurity, continuity, consulting and newer AI services create a sound SMB service fit.
Show 6 scoring factors and reasoning
Service clarity 5/5
Excellent evidence. Managed infrastructure, cybersecurity, continuity, consulting and newer AI services create a sound SMB service fit.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Service clarity within service fit & expertise.
Specialization 4/5
Strong evidence. Managed infrastructure, cybersecurity, continuity, consulting and newer AI services create a sound SMB service fit.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Specialization within service fit & expertise.
Credentials and certifications 4/5
Strong evidence. Managed infrastructure, cybersecurity, continuity, consulting and newer AI services create a sound SMB service fit.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Credentials and certifications within service fit & expertise.
Case studies and proof 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Managed infrastructure, cybersecurity, continuity, consulting and newer AI services create a sound SMB service fit.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Case studies and proof within service fit & expertise.
Staff expertise 4/5
Strong evidence. Managed infrastructure, cybersecurity, continuity, consulting and newer AI services create a sound SMB service fit.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Staff expertise within service fit & expertise.
Outcome evidence 4/5
Strong evidence. Managed infrastructure, cybersecurity, continuity, consulting and newer AI services create a sound SMB service fit.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Outcome evidence within service fit & expertise.
F. Customer experience signals
Public reviews emphasize friendly service and consultation, though response targets and pre-contact pricing are less explicit.
Show 6 scoring factors and reasoning
Contact accessibility 5/5
Excellent evidence. Public reviews emphasize friendly service and consultation, though response targets and pre-contact pricing are less explicit.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Contact accessibility within customer experience signals.
Response speed 4/5
Strong evidence. Public reviews emphasize friendly service and consultation, though response targets and pre-contact pricing are less explicit.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Response speed within customer experience signals.
Quote and intake quality 4/5
Strong evidence. Public reviews emphasize friendly service and consultation, though response targets and pre-contact pricing are less explicit.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Quote and intake quality within customer experience signals.
Pricing and value before contact 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Public reviews emphasize friendly service and consultation, though response targets and pre-contact pricing are less explicit.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Pricing and value before contact within customer experience signals.
Policies and guarantees 4/5
Strong evidence. Public reviews emphasize friendly service and consultation, though response targets and pre-contact pricing are less explicit.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Policies and guarantees within customer experience signals.
Communication and professionalism 5/5
Excellent evidence. Public reviews emphasize friendly service and consultation, though response targets and pre-contact pricing are less explicit.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Communication and professionalism within customer experience signals.
G. Website & technical trust
The site is secure and clear, with current service and ownership content and room for stronger search markup.
Show 4 scoring factors and reasoning
HTTPS, mobile and site availability 5/5
Excellent evidence. The site is secure and clear, with current service and ownership content and room for stronger search markup.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- HTTPS, mobile and site availability within website & technical trust.
Content freshness 4/5
Strong evidence. The site is secure and clear, with current service and ownership content and room for stronger search markup.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Content freshness within website & technical trust.
Structured data and search readiness 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. The site is secure and clear, with current service and ownership content and room for stronger search markup.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Structured data and search readiness within website & technical trust.
Privacy, legal and accessibility 5/5
Excellent evidence. The site is secure and clear, with current service and ownership content and room for stronger search markup.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Privacy, legal and accessibility within website & technical trust.
H. Authority & third-party validation
Ownership, local longevity and partner signals provide useful authority, while awards and earned media are moderately visible.
Show 4 scoring factors and reasoning
Directory presence 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Ownership, local longevity and partner signals provide useful authority, while awards and earned media are moderately visible.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Directory presence within authority & third-party validation.
Awards and recognition 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Ownership, local longevity and partner signals provide useful authority, while awards and earned media are moderately visible.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Awards and recognition within authority & third-party validation.
Earned media and backlinks 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Ownership, local longevity and partner signals provide useful authority, while awards and earned media are moderately visible.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Earned media and backlinks within authority & third-party validation.
Partner ecosystem 4/5
Strong evidence. Ownership, local longevity and partner signals provide useful authority, while awards and earned media are moderately visible.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Partner ecosystem within authority & third-party validation.
I. Social, content & community proof
HUB's local and Indigenous identity is reinforced across active social and community channels.
Show 3 scoring factors and reasoning
Social legitimacy and activity 5/5
Excellent evidence. HUB's local and Indigenous identity is reinforced across active social and community channels.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Social legitimacy and activity within social, content & community proof.
Educational content 4/5
Strong evidence. HUB's local and Indigenous identity is reinforced across active social and community channels.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Educational content within social, content & community proof.
Community involvement 5/5
Excellent evidence. HUB's local and Indigenous identity is reinforced across active social and community channels.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Community involvement within social, content & community proof.
J. Pricing & commercial transparency
The value proposition is understandable, but contract, payment and price mechanics are not published in detail.
Show 3 scoring factors and reasoning
Contract, scope and terms clarity 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. The value proposition is understandable, but contract, payment and price mechanics are not published in detail.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Contract, scope and terms clarity within pricing & commercial transparency.
Payment and deposit transparency 2/5
Limited public evidence. The value proposition is understandable, but contract, payment and price mechanics are not published in detail.
- Weighted result
- 0.8 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Payment and deposit transparency within pricing & commercial transparency.
Value competitiveness 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. The value proposition is understandable, but contract, payment and price mechanics are not published in detail.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Value competitiveness within pricing & commercial transparency.
Managed services and projects are priced through a consultative quote. No public rate card was found in the reviewed official pages.
View pricing sourceAsk for included support hours, escalation targets, onsite rates, project treatment and the cadence of strategic planning meetings.
CC
Clear Concepts, a Convergence Networks company
219 Kennedy Street, Winnipeg, MB R3C 1S8
Clear Concepts combines a substantial Winnipeg review history with the broader service platform of Convergence Networks. It remains a recognizable local option, but buyers will increasingly encounter the Convergence brand as the combined organization consolidates its online presence.
Organizations that want established Winnipeg support backed by a larger managed-services platform.
Strong local review volume, extended support coverage and broader capabilities through Convergence Networks.
The Clear Concepts domain now redirects to Convergence Networks while local directories still use the former brand, so buyers should confirm contracting entity and support ownership.
- Availability and follow-up
- Helpful user education
- Long-term trust
- Innovation
- Security and audit support
79.2 out of 100
Open any category, then expand an individual factor to see why it received its score and follow the supporting source.
A. Identity & local presence
The Kennedy Street listing remains clear, but the brand and domain transition creates some entity and citation inconsistency.
Show 5 scoring factors and reasoning
Google Business Profile completeness and control 4/5
Strong evidence. The Kennedy Street listing remains clear, but the brand and domain transition creates some entity and citation inconsistency.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Google Business Profile completeness and control within identity & local presence.
Name, address and phone consistency 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. The Kennedy Street listing remains clear, but the brand and domain transition creates some entity and citation inconsistency.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Name, address and phone consistency within identity & local presence.
Local service-area clarity 5/5
Excellent evidence. The Kennedy Street listing remains clear, but the brand and domain transition creates some entity and citation inconsistency.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Local service-area clarity within identity & local presence.
Hours and availability 5/5
Excellent evidence. The Kennedy Street listing remains clear, but the brand and domain transition creates some entity and citation inconsistency.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Hours and availability within identity & local presence.
Local search discoverability 4/5
Strong evidence. The Kennedy Street listing remains clear, but the brand and domain transition creates some entity and citation inconsistency.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Local search discoverability within identity & local presence.
B. Review strength
A 4.8 rating across 85 reviews creates one of the stronger local reputation signals in the field.
Show 6 scoring factors and reasoning
Rating strength 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 4.8 rating across 85 reviews creates one of the stronger local reputation signals in the field.
- Weighted result
- 3.0 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Rating strength within review strength.
Review volume versus the market 4/5
Strong evidence. A 4.8 rating across 85 reviews creates one of the stronger local reputation signals in the field.
- Weighted result
- 2.4 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review volume versus the market within review strength.
Review recency and cadence 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. A 4.8 rating across 85 reviews creates one of the stronger local reputation signals in the field.
- Weighted result
- 1.8 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review recency and cadence within review strength.
Review-platform diversity 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. A 4.8 rating across 85 reviews creates one of the stronger local reputation signals in the field.
- Weighted result
- 1.8 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review-platform diversity within review strength.
Sentiment depth 4/5
Strong evidence. A 4.8 rating across 85 reviews creates one of the stronger local reputation signals in the field.
- Weighted result
- 2.4 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Sentiment depth within review strength.
Critical-review rate and severity 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 4.8 rating across 85 reviews creates one of the stronger local reputation signals in the field.
- Weighted result
- 3.0 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Critical-review rate and severity within review strength.
C. Review trust & integrity
Review sentiment is coherent and detailed, though attribution now spans the legacy and parent brands.
Show 5 scoring factors and reasoning
Review authenticity risk 4/5
Strong evidence. Review sentiment is coherent and detailed, though attribution now spans the legacy and parent brands.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review authenticity risk within review trust & integrity.
Owner response behaviour 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Review sentiment is coherent and detailed, though attribution now spans the legacy and parent brands.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Owner response behaviour within review trust & integrity.
Complaint-resolution evidence 4/5
Strong evidence. Review sentiment is coherent and detailed, though attribution now spans the legacy and parent brands.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Complaint-resolution evidence within review trust & integrity.
Review-collection compliance 4/5
Strong evidence. Review sentiment is coherent and detailed, though attribution now spans the legacy and parent brands.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review-collection compliance within review trust & integrity.
Duplicate and identity integrity 4/5
Strong evidence. Review sentiment is coherent and detailed, though attribution now spans the legacy and parent brands.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Duplicate and identity integrity within review trust & integrity.
D. Online reputation risk
Long local continuity and the larger Convergence platform support stability, with rebrand transition as the main public risk signal.
Show 5 scoring factors and reasoning
BBB and consumer-complaint risk 5/5
Excellent evidence. Long local continuity and the larger Convergence platform support stability, with rebrand transition as the main public risk signal.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- BBB and consumer-complaint risk within online reputation risk.
Legal and regulatory risk 5/5
Excellent evidence. Long local continuity and the larger Convergence platform support stability, with rebrand transition as the main public risk signal.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Legal and regulatory risk within online reputation risk.
Scam and adverse-media risk 5/5
Excellent evidence. Long local continuity and the larger Convergence platform support stability, with rebrand transition as the main public risk signal.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Scam and adverse-media risk within online reputation risk.
Service-incident signals 5/5
Excellent evidence. Long local continuity and the larger Convergence platform support stability, with rebrand transition as the main public risk signal.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Service-incident signals within online reputation risk.
Continuity and stability 4/5
Strong evidence. Long local continuity and the larger Convergence platform support stability, with rebrand transition as the main public risk signal.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Continuity and stability within online reputation risk.
E. Service fit & expertise
Managed IT, cloud, security, Microsoft 365, collaboration, data and automation form a broad service set.
Show 6 scoring factors and reasoning
Service clarity 5/5
Excellent evidence. Managed IT, cloud, security, Microsoft 365, collaboration, data and automation form a broad service set.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Service clarity within service fit & expertise.
Specialization 5/5
Excellent evidence. Managed IT, cloud, security, Microsoft 365, collaboration, data and automation form a broad service set.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Specialization within service fit & expertise.
Credentials and certifications 4/5
Strong evidence. Managed IT, cloud, security, Microsoft 365, collaboration, data and automation form a broad service set.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Credentials and certifications within service fit & expertise.
Case studies and proof 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Managed IT, cloud, security, Microsoft 365, collaboration, data and automation form a broad service set.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Case studies and proof within service fit & expertise.
Staff expertise 4/5
Strong evidence. Managed IT, cloud, security, Microsoft 365, collaboration, data and automation form a broad service set.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Staff expertise within service fit & expertise.
Outcome evidence 4/5
Strong evidence. Managed IT, cloud, security, Microsoft 365, collaboration, data and automation form a broad service set.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Outcome evidence within service fit & expertise.
F. Customer experience signals
Extended support and strong review themes support the customer experience, while pricing and current-brand intake detail are moderate.
Show 6 scoring factors and reasoning
Contact accessibility 5/5
Excellent evidence. Extended support and strong review themes support the customer experience, while pricing and current-brand intake detail are moderate.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Contact accessibility within customer experience signals.
Response speed 4/5
Strong evidence. Extended support and strong review themes support the customer experience, while pricing and current-brand intake detail are moderate.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Response speed within customer experience signals.
Quote and intake quality 4/5
Strong evidence. Extended support and strong review themes support the customer experience, while pricing and current-brand intake detail are moderate.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Quote and intake quality within customer experience signals.
Pricing and value before contact 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Extended support and strong review themes support the customer experience, while pricing and current-brand intake detail are moderate.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Pricing and value before contact within customer experience signals.
Policies and guarantees 4/5
Strong evidence. Extended support and strong review themes support the customer experience, while pricing and current-brand intake detail are moderate.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Policies and guarantees within customer experience signals.
Communication and professionalism 4/5
Strong evidence. Extended support and strong review themes support the customer experience, while pricing and current-brand intake detail are moderate.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Communication and professionalism within customer experience signals.
G. Website & technical trust
The legacy domain redirects cleanly and the parent platform is secure and current, though local search continuity depends on careful schema and citation management.
Show 4 scoring factors and reasoning
HTTPS, mobile and site availability 5/5
Excellent evidence. The legacy domain redirects cleanly and the parent platform is secure and current, though local search continuity depends on careful schema and citation management.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- HTTPS, mobile and site availability within website & technical trust.
Content freshness 4/5
Strong evidence. The legacy domain redirects cleanly and the parent platform is secure and current, though local search continuity depends on careful schema and citation management.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Content freshness within website & technical trust.
Structured data and search readiness 4/5
Strong evidence. The legacy domain redirects cleanly and the parent platform is secure and current, though local search continuity depends on careful schema and citation management.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Structured data and search readiness within website & technical trust.
Privacy, legal and accessibility 5/5
Excellent evidence. The legacy domain redirects cleanly and the parent platform is secure and current, though local search continuity depends on careful schema and citation management.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Privacy, legal and accessibility within website & technical trust.
H. Authority & third-party validation
Directory and partner signals are sound, with modest awards and earned-media visibility at the local brand level.
Show 4 scoring factors and reasoning
Directory presence 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Directory and partner signals are sound, with modest awards and earned-media visibility at the local brand level.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Directory presence within authority & third-party validation.
Awards and recognition 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Directory and partner signals are sound, with modest awards and earned-media visibility at the local brand level.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Awards and recognition within authority & third-party validation.
Earned media and backlinks 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Directory and partner signals are sound, with modest awards and earned-media visibility at the local brand level.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Earned media and backlinks within authority & third-party validation.
Partner ecosystem 4/5
Strong evidence. Directory and partner signals are sound, with modest awards and earned-media visibility at the local brand level.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Partner ecosystem within authority & third-party validation.
I. Social, content & community proof
Educational content and legacy social profiles provide continuity, but the social identity is split between brands.
Show 3 scoring factors and reasoning
Social legitimacy and activity 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Educational content and legacy social profiles provide continuity, but the social identity is split between brands.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Social legitimacy and activity within social, content & community proof.
Educational content 4/5
Strong evidence. Educational content and legacy social profiles provide continuity, but the social identity is split between brands.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Educational content within social, content & community proof.
Community involvement 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Educational content and legacy social profiles provide continuity, but the social identity is split between brands.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Community involvement within social, content & community proof.
J. Pricing & commercial transparency
Some market benchmarks are available, while current contract, payment and managed-service rates require direct confirmation.
Show 3 scoring factors and reasoning
Contract, scope and terms clarity 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Some market benchmarks are available, while current contract, payment and managed-service rates require direct confirmation.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Contract, scope and terms clarity within pricing & commercial transparency.
Payment and deposit transparency 2/5
Limited public evidence. Some market benchmarks are available, while current contract, payment and managed-service rates require direct confirmation.
- Weighted result
- 0.8 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Payment and deposit transparency within pricing & commercial transparency.
Value competitiveness 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Some market benchmarks are available, while current contract, payment and managed-service rates require direct confirmation.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Value competitiveness within pricing & commercial transparency.
Clutch historically lists a $1,000+ project minimum and a $100 to $149 hourly benchmark. Managed-service pricing is custom quoted.
View pricing sourceConfirm which Convergence entity contracts the work, local staffing, after-hours coverage, onboarding costs and how legacy Clear Concepts agreements are handled.
Verified digital footprint
Only profiles identified for this specific company are included.
Review profiles
EI
Evident IT
325 Garry Street, Winnipeg, MB R3B 2G6
Evident IT is a smaller Winnipeg provider with a proactive, all-in support philosophy. Its live-ticket feedback and A+ BBB profile give buyers a useful view into service quality, while its compact footprint may appeal to organizations that prefer a boutique relationship.
Winnipeg SMBs looking for a smaller local provider with proactive support and straightforward account access.
A+ BBB accreditation, a 97% live-feedback signal and a practical all-in pricing philosophy.
The public review sample is smaller than those of the review leaders, and several recent entries are rating-only rather than text-rich.
- Helpful support
- Professional service
- Proactive partnership
- Strong ticket satisfaction
- Consistently high ratings
76.2 out of 100
Open any category, then expand an individual factor to see why it received its score and follow the supporting source.
A. Identity & local presence
The Garry Street address, phone and weekday hours align across the official site and local directory profiles.
Show 5 scoring factors and reasoning
Google Business Profile completeness and control 5/5
Excellent evidence. The Garry Street address, phone and weekday hours align across the official site and local directory profiles.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Google Business Profile completeness and control within identity & local presence.
Name, address and phone consistency 5/5
Excellent evidence. The Garry Street address, phone and weekday hours align across the official site and local directory profiles.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Name, address and phone consistency within identity & local presence.
Local service-area clarity 5/5
Excellent evidence. The Garry Street address, phone and weekday hours align across the official site and local directory profiles.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Local service-area clarity within identity & local presence.
Hours and availability 5/5
Excellent evidence. The Garry Street address, phone and weekday hours align across the official site and local directory profiles.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Hours and availability within identity & local presence.
Local search discoverability 4/5
Strong evidence. The Garry Street address, phone and weekday hours align across the official site and local directory profiles.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Local search discoverability within identity & local presence.
B. Review strength
A 4.9 rating across 14 reviews is positive, with a smaller text-rich sample and slower visible review cadence.
Show 6 scoring factors and reasoning
Rating strength 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 4.9 rating across 14 reviews is positive, with a smaller text-rich sample and slower visible review cadence.
- Weighted result
- 3.0 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Rating strength within review strength.
Review volume versus the market 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. A 4.9 rating across 14 reviews is positive, with a smaller text-rich sample and slower visible review cadence.
- Weighted result
- 1.8 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review volume versus the market within review strength.
Review recency and cadence 2/5
Limited public evidence. A 4.9 rating across 14 reviews is positive, with a smaller text-rich sample and slower visible review cadence.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review recency and cadence within review strength.
Review-platform diversity 2/5
Limited public evidence. A 4.9 rating across 14 reviews is positive, with a smaller text-rich sample and slower visible review cadence.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review-platform diversity within review strength.
Sentiment depth 4/5
Strong evidence. A 4.9 rating across 14 reviews is positive, with a smaller text-rich sample and slower visible review cadence.
- Weighted result
- 2.4 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Sentiment depth within review strength.
Critical-review rate and severity 5/5
Excellent evidence. A 4.9 rating across 14 reviews is positive, with a smaller text-rich sample and slower visible review cadence.
- Weighted result
- 3.0 of 3.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Critical-review rate and severity within review strength.
C. Review trust & integrity
The entity profile is coherent and ratings look natural, though owner-response visibility and platform diversity are limited.
Show 5 scoring factors and reasoning
Review authenticity risk 4/5
Strong evidence. The entity profile is coherent and ratings look natural, though owner-response visibility and platform diversity are limited.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review authenticity risk within review trust & integrity.
Owner response behaviour 2/5
Limited public evidence. The entity profile is coherent and ratings look natural, though owner-response visibility and platform diversity are limited.
- Weighted result
- 0.8 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Owner response behaviour within review trust & integrity.
Complaint-resolution evidence 4/5
Strong evidence. The entity profile is coherent and ratings look natural, though owner-response visibility and platform diversity are limited.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Complaint-resolution evidence within review trust & integrity.
Review-collection compliance 4/5
Strong evidence. The entity profile is coherent and ratings look natural, though owner-response visibility and platform diversity are limited.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Review-collection compliance within review trust & integrity.
Duplicate and identity integrity 5/5
Excellent evidence. The entity profile is coherent and ratings look natural, though owner-response visibility and platform diversity are limited.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Duplicate and identity integrity within review trust & integrity.
D. Online reputation risk
BBB accreditation, an A+ rating and a stable 2012 operating history create strong risk and continuity evidence.
Show 5 scoring factors and reasoning
BBB and consumer-complaint risk 5/5
Excellent evidence. BBB accreditation, an A+ rating and a stable 2012 operating history create strong risk and continuity evidence.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- BBB and consumer-complaint risk within online reputation risk.
Legal and regulatory risk 5/5
Excellent evidence. BBB accreditation, an A+ rating and a stable 2012 operating history create strong risk and continuity evidence.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Legal and regulatory risk within online reputation risk.
Scam and adverse-media risk 5/5
Excellent evidence. BBB accreditation, an A+ rating and a stable 2012 operating history create strong risk and continuity evidence.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Scam and adverse-media risk within online reputation risk.
Service-incident signals 5/5
Excellent evidence. BBB accreditation, an A+ rating and a stable 2012 operating history create strong risk and continuity evidence.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Service-incident signals within online reputation risk.
Continuity and stability 5/5
Excellent evidence. BBB accreditation, an A+ rating and a stable 2012 operating history create strong risk and continuity evidence.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Continuity and stability within online reputation risk.
E. Service fit & expertise
Core managed IT, strategy, cloud and cybersecurity services are clear, while specialization, staff depth and case-study volume are more modest.
Show 6 scoring factors and reasoning
Service clarity 4/5
Strong evidence. Core managed IT, strategy, cloud and cybersecurity services are clear, while specialization, staff depth and case-study volume are more modest.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Service clarity within service fit & expertise.
Specialization 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Core managed IT, strategy, cloud and cybersecurity services are clear, while specialization, staff depth and case-study volume are more modest.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Specialization within service fit & expertise.
Credentials and certifications 4/5
Strong evidence. Core managed IT, strategy, cloud and cybersecurity services are clear, while specialization, staff depth and case-study volume are more modest.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Credentials and certifications within service fit & expertise.
Case studies and proof 2/5
Limited public evidence. Core managed IT, strategy, cloud and cybersecurity services are clear, while specialization, staff depth and case-study volume are more modest.
- Weighted result
- 0.8 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Case studies and proof within service fit & expertise.
Staff expertise 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Core managed IT, strategy, cloud and cybersecurity services are clear, while specialization, staff depth and case-study volume are more modest.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Staff expertise within service fit & expertise.
Outcome evidence 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. Core managed IT, strategy, cloud and cybersecurity services are clear, while specialization, staff depth and case-study volume are more modest.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Outcome evidence within service fit & expertise.
F. Customer experience signals
Direct contact, helpful review sentiment and a proactive model support a solid experience score.
Show 6 scoring factors and reasoning
Contact accessibility 5/5
Excellent evidence. Direct contact, helpful review sentiment and a proactive model support a solid experience score.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Contact accessibility within customer experience signals.
Response speed 4/5
Strong evidence. Direct contact, helpful review sentiment and a proactive model support a solid experience score.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Response speed within customer experience signals.
Quote and intake quality 4/5
Strong evidence. Direct contact, helpful review sentiment and a proactive model support a solid experience score.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Quote and intake quality within customer experience signals.
Pricing and value before contact 4/5
Strong evidence. Direct contact, helpful review sentiment and a proactive model support a solid experience score.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Pricing and value before contact within customer experience signals.
Policies and guarantees 4/5
Strong evidence. Direct contact, helpful review sentiment and a proactive model support a solid experience score.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Policies and guarantees within customer experience signals.
Communication and professionalism 5/5
Excellent evidence. Direct contact, helpful review sentiment and a proactive model support a solid experience score.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Communication and professionalism within customer experience signals.
G. Website & technical trust
The site is secure and includes privacy signals, with less content freshness and structured-data evidence than the leaders.
Show 4 scoring factors and reasoning
HTTPS, mobile and site availability 5/5
Excellent evidence. The site is secure and includes privacy signals, with less content freshness and structured-data evidence than the leaders.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- HTTPS, mobile and site availability within website & technical trust.
Content freshness 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. The site is secure and includes privacy signals, with less content freshness and structured-data evidence than the leaders.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Content freshness within website & technical trust.
Structured data and search readiness 2/5
Limited public evidence. The site is secure and includes privacy signals, with less content freshness and structured-data evidence than the leaders.
- Weighted result
- 0.8 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Structured data and search readiness within website & technical trust.
Privacy, legal and accessibility 5/5
Excellent evidence. The site is secure and includes privacy signals, with less content freshness and structured-data evidence than the leaders.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Privacy, legal and accessibility within website & technical trust.
H. Authority & third-party validation
BBB, Microsoft, Aruba and Field Effect signals provide useful validation; awards and earned media are less visible.
Show 4 scoring factors and reasoning
Directory presence 5/5
Excellent evidence. BBB, Microsoft, Aruba and Field Effect signals provide useful validation; awards and earned media are less visible.
- Weighted result
- 2.0 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Directory presence within authority & third-party validation.
Awards and recognition 2/5
Limited public evidence. BBB, Microsoft, Aruba and Field Effect signals provide useful validation; awards and earned media are less visible.
- Weighted result
- 0.8 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Awards and recognition within authority & third-party validation.
Earned media and backlinks 2/5
Limited public evidence. BBB, Microsoft, Aruba and Field Effect signals provide useful validation; awards and earned media are less visible.
- Weighted result
- 0.8 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Earned media and backlinks within authority & third-party validation.
Partner ecosystem 4/5
Strong evidence. BBB, Microsoft, Aruba and Field Effect signals provide useful validation; awards and earned media are less visible.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Partner ecosystem within authority & third-party validation.
I. Social, content & community proof
The company maintains identifiable social accounts and some educational content, with a smaller public content footprint.
Show 3 scoring factors and reasoning
Social legitimacy and activity 2/5
Limited public evidence. The company maintains identifiable social accounts and some educational content, with a smaller public content footprint.
- Weighted result
- 0.8 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Social legitimacy and activity within social, content & community proof.
Educational content 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. The company maintains identifiable social accounts and some educational content, with a smaller public content footprint.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Educational content within social, content & community proof.
Community involvement 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. The company maintains identifiable social accounts and some educational content, with a smaller public content footprint.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Community involvement within social, content & community proof.
J. Pricing & commercial transparency
The all-in philosophy is clear, while contract, payment and exact rate mechanics remain custom.
Show 3 scoring factors and reasoning
Contract, scope and terms clarity 4/5
Strong evidence. The all-in philosophy is clear, while contract, payment and exact rate mechanics remain custom.
- Weighted result
- 1.6 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Contract, scope and terms clarity within pricing & commercial transparency.
Payment and deposit transparency 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. The all-in philosophy is clear, while contract, payment and exact rate mechanics remain custom.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Payment and deposit transparency within pricing & commercial transparency.
Value competitiveness 3/5
Useful evidence with a gap. The all-in philosophy is clear, while contract, payment and exact rate mechanics remain custom.
- Weighted result
- 1.2 of 2.0 points
- What this factor measures
- Value competitiveness within pricing & commercial transparency.
Evident describes an all-in proactive pricing model. Exact monthly rates, inclusions and minimums are not published.
View pricing sourceAsk for a complete included-services list, onboarding fees, project exclusions, after-hours terms and a sample monthly service report.
Verified digital footprint
Only profiles identified for this specific company are included.